27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER SIX<br />

FURTHER CONSIDERATION AND CONCLUSION<br />

I. Introduction<br />

Chapter five offers an overview of responses to a<br />

survey of lecturers who teach preaching in Great Britain.<br />

After stating the overall picture, it compares responses of<br />

contrasting subgroups of lecturers. The lecturer<br />

subgroupings were based on several different criteria.<br />

The theological division of lecturers supports this<br />

study's basic premise that a lecturer's theology determines<br />

his teaching of preaching (particularly in its content).<br />

Tables 40-42 display the statistical results of that<br />

subgrouping. Those figures raise three questions critical<br />

to the practice of Christian preaching and document the<br />

lecturers' contrasting answers.<br />

The questions? (1) "From what source(s) should<br />

preachers draw sermon content?" (2) "By what criteria<br />

should preachers select material from that source (those<br />

sources)?" (3) "What principles should preachers follow in<br />

preparing for actual preaching moments?"<br />

This chapter considers these three questions in greater<br />

depth. These questions bear similarity to others considered<br />

in chapters two and three. There, each of seven important<br />

twentieth century preacher—theologians is given opportunity,<br />

as it were, to explain his thought in relation to six<br />

foundational aspects of preaching: content, source, setting<br />

(recipients), purpose, communication factors, and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!