27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

154<br />

academic education would be inadequate. Reason alone<br />

cannot prove the truth of the twelve consensus<br />

statements, even in their present general state. They<br />

can be accepted only by faith. Likewise, each of the<br />

questions derived from them can be answered only on the<br />

basis of faith. While a student may learn the facts of<br />

someone else's faith (someone else's answers to the<br />

questions) academically, he never develops his own faith<br />

In a rote manner.<br />

While an academic institution cannot directly elicit<br />

faith in its students, it does bear responsibility for<br />

the way in which it influences students' faith<br />

development. For example. the p atterns of faith seen in<br />

lecturers (and student colleagues) contributes to or<br />

hinders growth in faith. College worship experiences can<br />

do likewise.<br />

And although lecturers cannot teach faith. they can<br />

inculcate grounds for faith. They can present the<br />

historic symbols which have inspired and guided faith.<br />

They can discuss the history of man's relationship with<br />

the Divine, both its peaks and moments of man's greatest<br />

failure.<br />

Admittedly, these subjects receive primary treatment<br />

in the study of Systematic Theology, Old Testament, New<br />

Testament, Church History, and Christian Ethics. Yet,<br />

those who bear specific responsibility for teaching<br />

preaching review, in their lectures, these basic<br />

theological questions to help students integrate the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!