27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER FIVE NOTES (p. 183-264)<br />

1 Several survey questions did not play as important<br />

a role in this study as originally planned. These questions<br />

dealt with potential changes in preaching (and the teaching<br />

of preaching) both at individual colleges as well as in the<br />

broader context of the church as a whole. A summary of the<br />

overall response to these questions appears in appendix six.<br />

2This chapter rarely considers individual settings<br />

where homiletical education occurs. The various comparisons<br />

are based on statistical descriptions of contrasting groups<br />

of institutions. To achieve its goal, the study required<br />

this methodology. Within this chapter, the individual<br />

settings (where live lecturers interact with actual<br />

students) regretfully disappears into the mist of the<br />

composite. As Paul Tillich wrote, "Types are logical ideals<br />

for the sake of discerning understanding; they do not exist<br />

in time and space, and in reality we find . . . a mixture of<br />

types in every particular example." Christianity and the<br />

Encounter of the World Religions. (New York: Columbia<br />

University Press), p. 54,55.<br />

3 Although this goal of teaching preaching did not<br />

specifically mention the Bible, there seemed to be a<br />

correlation between a high priority given to this goal and<br />

an awe before Scripture as evidenced in other survey<br />

responses. See talbles 26,28,30, and 31 below.<br />

"A few incorrect figures, particularly large ones,<br />

can greatly skew an average, while their effect on a median<br />

Is smaller.<br />

F.R. Jolliffe, Survey Design and Analysis.<br />

(Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1986), p. 25.<br />

s There certainly would have been more than one<br />

method of coding the responses to the open questions. In<br />

notes 7-11, I list actual survey responses which underlie my<br />

system of coding.<br />

7 In many cases, the lecturers used phrases identical<br />

to the ones I used in coding. Question ten brought more<br />

variety than the others. Other lecturer wordings include:<br />

Bible: "Exposition," "God's Word," "Exegesis," "The<br />

text in context," "Interpretation"<br />

Congregation: "Knowing the people," "Relevance to<br />

audience," "Awareness of listener response," "Empathy,"<br />

"Knowledge of the culture to which one is speaking,"<br />

"Pastoral work," "Sensitivity," "The contemporary context,"<br />

"Feedback systems," "The need to listen," "Preach to the<br />

people," "Community," "Contextualisation," "Realism in<br />

presentation," "Openness toward the world," "The local<br />

church," "Appropriateness," "Rapport," "Knowing the people"<br />

Sermon construction: "Content," "Shaping of material,"<br />

"Different sorts of sermons," "Having one idea,"<br />

"Organisation," "Having something to say," "Sermon<br />

preparation," "The structure of a sermon," "Introductions<br />

and conclusions," "Illustrations," "Written sermons,"<br />

"Study," "Simplicity of thought," "Methods of preaching"<br />

Communication skills: "Clarity," "Words," "Delivery,"<br />

"Brevity-conciseness," "Imagination," "Humour,"<br />

"Enthusiasm," "Interest," "Can it be understood?"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!