27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

325<br />

and Now," in Barth, God Here and Now. (London: Routledge<br />

and Kegan Paul, 1964), p. 3.)<br />

.7 Barth, Church Dogmatics: 1.1. Translated by G.T.<br />

Thomson. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1936), p. 134,35.<br />

& Ibid. p. 129,30.<br />

narth, The Knowledge of God and the Service of God<br />

According to the Teaching of the Reformation. Translated by<br />

J.L.M. Haire and Ian Henderson. (London: Hodder and<br />

Stoughton, 1938), P. 38.<br />

p. 82-84. (Cf. "It is again Jesus Christ<br />

in whose existence sin is revealed, not only in its<br />

actuality and sinfulness, but as the truth of all human<br />

being and activity." Church Dogmatics: IV.1. Translated<br />

by G.W. Bromiley. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1956). p.<br />

403; Also, "The decisive thing is not that He [Christ] has<br />

suffered what we ought to have suffered so that we do not<br />

have to suffer it, the destruction to which we have fallen<br />

victim by our guilt, and therefore the punishment we<br />

deserve. This is true, of course. But it is true only as<br />

it derives from the decisive thing that in the suffering and<br />

death of Jesus Christ it has come to pass that in His own<br />

person He has made an end of us as sinners and therefore of<br />

sin itself by going to death as the One who took our place<br />

as sinners. In His person He has delivered up us sinners<br />

and sin itself to destruction." IV.!. p. 253.)<br />

11 Barth, Knowledge. p. 84-85. (Cf. Barth,<br />

Evangelical Theology: An Introduction. Translated by<br />

Grover Foley. (Grand Rapids: Eerdman's, 1963), p. 19-22;<br />

and Barth, Credo. Translated by J. Strathearn McNab.<br />

(London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1936), p. 48,49.)<br />

12Barth, Evangelical Theology. p. 32.<br />

1-s Barth, Prayer. p. 103-05. (Cf. I.1. p. 111-29.)<br />

"'The broader term "proclamation" most accurately<br />

describe Barth's thinking on the third form of God's<br />

self-disclosure. Since preaching is proclamation (although<br />

not all proclamation is preaching), what Barth wrote<br />

concerning proclamation would be true of preaching, (and<br />

also of other aspects of proclamation, including the<br />

sacraments, and, perhaps, also "prayer and active love,<br />

instruction and theology.") 1.1. p. 58. (Cf. p. 98,99.)<br />

Barth himself gave pre-eminence, within proclamation, to<br />

preaching. He began an argument using these two premises:<br />

"If there is such a thing as proclamation of the Word of<br />

God, and if preaching is foremost in proclamation, then it<br />

[the Church] must speak to social situations." From Karl<br />

Barth's Table Talk. Edited by John D. Godsey. (Edinburgh:<br />

Oliver and Boyd, 1963), p. 20. (I employ quotations from<br />

Table Talk guardedly. This work does not present Barth's<br />

own exact words, but a text resulting from a shorthand<br />

transcription of a Barthian interview.) Since the focus of<br />

this paper is preaching, I use this narrower term in<br />

discussing Barth's theology.<br />

l Although Barth does not explicityly include<br />

tradition as a source of revelation, he freely admitted his<br />

debt to nineteen centuries of church tradition. He used,<br />

extensively, the ancient creeds and council statements. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!