27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

364<br />

that statement and "the preacher must be true to tradition"<br />

is not great.<br />

-7-eThe 'Lloyd-Jones' statistic for question eight is<br />

an exception.<br />

Admittedly, survey responses relating to teaching<br />

methodology do not frequently appear on tables 40-42. Of<br />

the data lines dealing with more content oriented responses,<br />

almost 80% do appear on those tables, thus indicating that<br />

the theological pairing scheme helps to explain the<br />

distribution of specific responses.<br />

°These other patterns include lines where:<br />

'related' colleges are paired with one of the other types,<br />

the 'related' colleges are isolated on an extreme, or where<br />

the data indicates relative similarity among all three<br />

types. Statistically, these phrases can be defined as<br />

follows:<br />

1. All three types are similar--less than ten percent<br />

difference in data dealing with percentages, two years or<br />

less difference on questions 11 and 13.b.<br />

2. For the other three patterns, in order for an<br />

institutional type to stand alone (not be paired with<br />

another), the distance between the intermediate statistic<br />

and the extreme to which it is nearest must be more than 25<br />

percent of the difference between the two extremes.<br />

1 To determine what each group's survey responses<br />

would be if there were no institutional factor, and each<br />

subgroup's responses, thus, were precisely proportional to<br />

its theological make-up, I computed the "theologically<br />

predicted mean." I took the appropriate figures from tables<br />

26-39, and weighted them proportionally in computing means.<br />

(For example, in computing the "theologically predicted<br />

means" for university lecturers, I weighted the responses<br />

from 'Tillich lecturers' three times as heavily as responses<br />

from 'Bultmann' and 'Stewart' lecturers, as per the table<br />

below.<br />

The correlation between institutional type and the<br />

theologian with whom the preaching lecturers identify is as<br />

follows:<br />

University departments:<br />

Tillich 3<br />

Bultmann 1<br />

Stewart 1<br />

Other 1<br />

Related colleges:<br />

Rahner 4<br />

Stewart 4<br />

Tillich 3<br />

Lloyd-Jones 2.5<br />

Barth 1.5<br />

Fosdick 1<br />

Other 3<br />

Independent colleges:<br />

Lloyd-Jones 16.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!