27.12.2013 Views

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Arthur Bence PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

263<br />

Factors favoring lecturer openness:<br />

Question 14--Work required of students:<br />

Parish sermons 33.3% 64.0% 16.7% 23.1%<br />

Chapel sermons 33.3% 8.0% 0.0% 15.4%<br />

Seminars 0.0% 24.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

The Episcopal lecturers offer the most clearcut<br />

position. Their strong leaning toward an open<br />

(non-directive) teaching style appears in all but one<br />

table 86 data line. On several of these data lines, the<br />

Episcopal statistics evidence more open-mindedness than<br />

the theologically predicted means suggest, indicating an<br />

important denominational influence here.<br />

Favoring a more directive teaching style,<br />

Presbyterian (university) and Evangelical lecturers loin<br />

hands on this question (though their rationale behind<br />

this practice likely differs).71'-1<br />

While the typical Presbyterian lecturer may exert<br />

more control in the preaching classroom, he encourages<br />

student learning from other sources. The Evangelical<br />

lecturers, joined by the Baptist lecturers, do not, to<br />

the same degree, encourage this outside learning.<br />

Table 87<br />

Bapt. Epis. Pres. Evan.<br />

Question 16.a.--Interaction with other theological<br />

disciplines:<br />

Direct<br />

involvement 0.0% 24.0% 33.3% 7.7%<br />

At least an openness to<br />

integration 33.3% 48.0% 66.7% 38.5%<br />

Question 16.b.--Relevance of arts and sciences:<br />

Useful 28.6% 17.4% 66.7% 15.4%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!