29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82<br />

may identify with the alleged cult experiences of others, reproducing them as their own,<br />

without any conscious intent ofdeceit.<br />

A fifth alternative explanation is the 'screen memory' hypothesis. The problem with this<br />

hypothesis is that the purpose of the screen memory is to protect the individual from a<br />

more painful or anxiety-provoking memory/fantasy. However, the pre-cult family lives<br />

of many cult survivors are filled with clearly-recalled parental abuse and/or neglect. The<br />

'screen memories' of cult abuse would thus serve no conceivable defensive purpose<br />

(Greaves, 1992).<br />

A sixth alternative explanation draws on lung's concept of the archetypes of the<br />

collective unconscious (Greaves, 1992). Archetypes are unconscious, transpersonal,<br />

experiential templates which structure or shape experience in predetermined ways.<br />

Because abuse, ritual, and the supernatural are archetypal possibilities, it is possible that<br />

some individuals may unconsciously fuse these archetypal images and feelings into<br />

composite occult abuse scenarios, which in fact never occurred. In psychotic states, the<br />

'swamping' of consciousness by the archetypes of the collective unconscious may well<br />

occur, but delusions of the proportion attributed to alleged cult survivors suggests that<br />

they must all be psychotic. While this diagnostic status may hold true for some alleged<br />

cult survivors, it certainly does not characterise all ·of them, thereby weakening the<br />

archetypal hypothesis.<br />

The seventh, and last alternative explanation to be discussed, is that of the 'personal<br />

myth' hypothesis (Greaves, 1992). If myths are collective allegorical or metaphorical<br />

depictions of profound personal truths, then certain individuals may attempt to cope with<br />

traumatic events by creating personal myths - satanic abuse narratives in this case - which<br />

have a compelling subjective reality. However, belief in a personal myth to the extent<br />

that this ceases to be a metaphor implies severely impaired reality testing, and hence<br />

psychotic thinking. Once again, this theory could arguably pertain only to those alleged<br />

cult survivors who are demonstrably psychotic.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!