29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

136<br />

Simultaneously, however, the life instinct finds expression in the projection of libidinal<br />

impulses onto the .first object, thereby creating a good breast which too is internalised as a<br />

defence against persecutory anxiety (Klein, 1946). Although it is the same object which<br />

is simultaneously loved and hated, this reality cannot be acknowledged by the infant for<br />

fear that if good and bad internal objects are integrated, the bad will destroy the good<br />

object upon which the infantile ego depends for its existence and development. The early<br />

developmental solution to this dilemma is to employ the defensive fantasy ofsplitting the<br />

object into two, thereby creating polarised and dissociated good and bad objects. Because<br />

the original object is split, the infant then relates in a dualistic fashion to two antagonistic<br />

part-objects, which are respectively loved and hated. These good and bad internal figures<br />

form the nucleus ofthe infantile superego (Klein, 1952a).<br />

In addition to the primary defences of splitting and introjection of the good object a<br />

number of associated defences protect the infant from persecutory anxiety. The most<br />

important of these are idealisation and denial. Idealisation is a fantasy in which the<br />

positive attributes ofthe good part-object are defensively exaggerated:<br />

as a safeguard against the fear ofthe persecuting breast. While idealization is<br />

thus the corollary of persecutory fear, it also springs from the power of<br />

instinctual desires which aim at unlimited gratification and therefore create<br />

the picture of an inexhaustible and always bountiful breast - an ideal breast"<br />

(Klein, 1946, p. 7).<br />

Klein emphasises the distinction between a good object and an idealised one, based on<br />

the extent ofthe aggression, and accompanying intensity ofsplitting defences:<br />

A very deep split between the two aspects of the object indicates that it is not<br />

the good and bad objects that are being kept apart but an idealized and<br />

extremely bad one. So deep and sharp a division reveals that the destructive<br />

impulses, envy, and persecutory anxiety are very strong and that idealization<br />

serves mainly as a defence against these emotions (Klein, 1957, p. 192)<br />

Importantly, idealisation promotes further splitting because "parts of the ego attempt to<br />

unite with the ideal object" (Klein, 1946, p. 10). At the same time, the psychic existence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!