29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

197<br />

In lung's model of mind, even more so than in Freud's, the psychic components are<br />

semi-autonomous, owing to lung's incorporation of the impersonal collective<br />

unconscious (Frey-Rohn, 1974). The most independent, spontaneous components are<br />

consequently called autonomous complexes. The autonomy of these aspects is such<br />

that their influence is felt to be ego-alien, strange, and even endowed with magical<br />

power. Meier (1984) refers to the complex as:<br />

a relatively compact structure, which lives the life of a foreign body or<br />

corpus alienum in the psychic organism as a whole ... In this respect their<br />

nature is in no way different from that of living organisms, a peculiarity<br />

which undoubtedly invests them with an uncanny atmosphere (p. 204).<br />

In addition, complexes have a personified quality, which makes them appear to be<br />

separate personalities. The complex, said lung, "behaves like an animated foreign<br />

body in the sphere of consciousness" (1948, p. 96). lung, struck by this quality<br />

referred to complexes as "fragmentary personalities" or "splinter psyches", which have<br />

their own consciousness (1954, p. 201-204). This convinced him that the psyche is not<br />

an indivisible unit, but rather a collection of split-off sub-personalities, which co-exist<br />

without normally destroying the continuity ofthe individual's existence:<br />

The tendency to split means that parts of the psyche detach<br />

themselves from consciousness to such an extent that they not only<br />

appear foreign but lead an autonomous life oftheir own. It need not<br />

be a question of hysterical multiple personality, or schizophrenic<br />

alterations of personality, but merely of so-called 'complexes' that<br />

come entirely within the scope ofthe normal (lung, 1936, p. 121).<br />

lung adopted the term dissociation from Pierre lanet (1859-1947) to refer to this<br />

splitting process. lanet defined dissociation as an inherently pathological process,<br />

whereby parallel associative mental systems split off and function independently of<br />

normal consciousness as "secondary existences" (NolI, 1989). For lung, however,<br />

dissociation was a fundamental, adaptive psychic process, leading to psychological<br />

differentiation and expansion. Normal psychic life is characterised by multiplicity,<br />

rather than unity, and complexes are the embodiment of our psychic plurality. But<br />

lung also acknowledged that when dissociation is initiated by trauma or extreme<br />

psychic conflict, the resulting complex is neither benign nor readily assimilable into the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!