29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

332<br />

argues in this regard that narrative is not "an alternative to truth or reality; rather, it is the<br />

mode in which, inevitably, truth and reality are presented. We have only versions of the<br />

true and the real" (p. xv). Internal objects, psychic structures and archetypes form part of<br />

narrative schemas and do not correspond to, or contradict, some extra-discursive external<br />

reality.<br />

From this herrneneutic perspective, psychological research is not concerned with the<br />

essential truth of a phenomenon but, as Kenneth Gergen says, with "crafting systems of<br />

intelligibility" (Gergen, 1989, p. 257). In preceding chapters, it was argued that both<br />

object relations psychoanalysis and Jungian theory provide coherent systems of<br />

intelligibility. Hopefully, the Results Chapter has illustrated both the coherence and<br />

usefulness of explaining Satanism in terms of a psychoanalytic theory premised upon the<br />

intrapsychic manifestation and transformation of interpersonal relationships. However,<br />

although the methodology and data analysis assumed an explicit object relations<br />

perspective, to exclude analytical psychology - the other major historical depth psychology<br />

tradition - would be to sacrifice a potentially rich dialogue. For this reason, the remaining<br />

discussion will entertain a synthetic vision, one which seeks to integrate the historically<br />

divergent discourses ofpsychoanalytic and Jungian thought.<br />

15.2 An archetypal object relations theory of demonic possessive states<br />

In Chapter Thirteen, it was argued that, despite theoretical differences between object<br />

relations and Jungian perspectives, these approaches both complement each other and<br />

have enough common understanding ofpsychodynamics to warrant integrating them into a<br />

comprehensive interpretation of demonic phenomena. At this point, a brief summary of<br />

the proposed archetypal object relations model will remind readers of the broad<br />

interpretative parameters guiding the following discussion. The model's basic assumption<br />

is that our polypsychic life comprises both integrative and dissociative tendencies, which<br />

play them themselves out in shifting identity structures constellated around personified<br />

archaic complexes. These, in turn, arise from the dialectical interplay of transpersonal<br />

archetypal fantasies and personal experiences with significant others. The human

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!