29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116<br />

derives from their childhood experIence of paternal figures, overlaid by inherited<br />

phylogenetic memory traces of a primal father. Whatever the real nature of children's<br />

relationships with their fathers, they are complicated by oedipal impulses and fantasies,<br />

and these characteristic ambivalent feelings and attitudes find displaced expression in the<br />

individual's perception of God. A strong impetus to religious belief is the human<br />

species' collective memory of the parricidal slaying of the primal father, which reinforces<br />

humankind's need for social taboos and religious ritual atonement. The superego is the<br />

psychic structure which serves as a template for God. The internalised image of the<br />

father, which forms the nucleus of the superego, is externalised via the mechanism of<br />

projection to create the perception of a deity independent of our own psychic life. The<br />

spectre of Oedipus hangs over humankind's spiritual quests, and the inherent sinfulness<br />

which Christianity attributes to man takes on a new and poignant significance in the light<br />

of our incestuous and parricidal wishes, and the accompanying eternal remorse. For these<br />

ontogenetic and phylogenetic reasons, religion is necessarily bound up with moral taboos,<br />

sin, guilt and the desire for reconciliation with a deity injured and angered by the actions<br />

of 'His children'. For the same reason, the incest taboo and the law of exogamy are<br />

strictly observed in all known cultures. Religious belief and practice, because it serves<br />

the unconscious function of controlling unconscious impulses and assuaging the anxiety<br />

and guilt associated with prohibited fantasies, has the same status as neurotic symptoms<br />

and other compromise formations.<br />

7.2 Satan, demonic pacts, and demonic possession in classical psychoanalysis<br />

Freud was heir to the psychogenic interpretations of possession postulated by his<br />

intellectual forebears, Janet and Charcot. It is thus not surprising to find Breuer, Freud's<br />

co-author ofStudies on Hysteria (1893-95), asserting:<br />

The split-off mind is the devil with which the unsophisticated observation of<br />

early superstitious times believed that these patients were possessed. It is true<br />

that a spirit alien to the patient's waking consciousness holds sway in him;<br />

but the spirit is not in fact an alien one, but a part ofhis own (p. 250).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!