29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

217<br />

12.2 The role of fantasy in psychological life<br />

The nature and function of unconscious fantasy in psychological life is an obvious point<br />

to begin exploring the parallels between Jungian and object relations theory. Jung<br />

considered fantasy to be the psyche's most characteristic activity (Samuels, et aI, 1986).<br />

Klein and Fairbairn, too, considered fantasy to be the foundational activity and content of<br />

psychic life. All three theorists accepted the importance of the related fantasies of<br />

introjection and projection as serving normal, pathological, and defensive functions. All<br />

identified projective processes as the means by which an aspect of the self is<br />

unconsciously externalised and personified. Furthermore, Jung's concept ofparticipation<br />

mystique, which he used to describe a relationship in which a subject is partially and<br />

unconsciously identified with an object, and hence has influence over it (and vice versa),<br />

is little different from Klein's concept of projective identification. This is particularly<br />

evident in his 1957 description ofparticipation mystique:<br />

When there is no consciousness of the difference between subject and object,<br />

an unconscious identity prevails. The unconscious is then projected into the<br />

object, and the object is introjected into the subject, becoming part of his<br />

psychology. Then plants and animals behave like human beings, human<br />

beings are at the same time animals, and everything is alive with ghosts and<br />

gods (p. 45).<br />

The shared emphasis on the role of fantasy can be taken much further. Certain analytic<br />

authors (Gordon, 1985; Lambert, 1981; Samuels, 1985; Solomon, 1991) have<br />

acknowledged a striking similarity between the Kleinian concept of fantasy and Jung's<br />

concept ofarchetypes. This will be explored in the following section.<br />

12.3 Fantasy and/as archetype<br />

Fordham recognised that Jung's description of archetypes as "a psychic expression of the<br />

physiological and anatomical disposition" (cited in Astor, 1990, p. 266) was close to the<br />

Kleinian definition offantasy as the mental corollary ofinstinctual impulses and activities<br />

(Isaacs, 1952; Klein, 1952). Samuels (1985) states that "it is Klein's notion of<br />

unconscious fantasy ... that is the psychoanalytic idea most closely aligned with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!