29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

77<br />

supporting a history of alleged satanic ritual abuse are elusive, hidden, and dissociated<br />

from conscious memory, many mental health professionals attend workshops run by<br />

"experts", who instruct them in the art of eliciting and interpreting relevant information.<br />

The implicit demand is that clinicians accept the reality of satanic cults and their practices<br />

before they can begin to hear what their patients are communicating. Those mental health<br />

professionals who successfully complete accredited Satanic Ritual Abuse training<br />

workshops are taught that the absence of satanic-related memories does not invalidate the<br />

theory of ritual abuse in any case. In fact, by invoking the phenomenon of dissociation,<br />

the absence ofmemory in this regard may be considered a positive sign of a satanic abuse<br />

history. The above factors, combined with the mass media's eagerness to disseminate<br />

Satanist-related stories, as well as popular demand for educational workshops by credible<br />

social-service Satanism "experts", created and sustained the belief that Satanism was a<br />

vast underground movement (Richardson, Best & Bromley, 1991; Stevens, 1990).<br />

Implicit in the constructionist account of subversive and countersubversive ideologies is<br />

the assumption that the antisatanist ideology is either a delusional construct or necessarily<br />

disproportionate to the opinions and actions of self-professed Satanists (Bromley, 1991;<br />

Carlson & Larue, 1990; Stevens, 1990). Indeed, the perceived threat of Satanism is<br />

given exaggerated credence by those deviants attracted to it (Stevens, 1990). The satanic<br />

subversion myth has proved remarkably resilient in technologically sophisticated societies<br />

which pride themselves on their scientific knowledge and rational worldview. In fact, the<br />

sceptical voice of scientific reason does not seem to have impacted on popular belief in<br />

the posited reality of the satanic threat. In America, the Committee for Scientific<br />

Investigation of Religion (CSER) spent three years investigating allegations of satanic<br />

activity in America. Carlson and Larue (1990), commenting on the findings of the<br />

committee, conclude that:<br />

After three years of investigating allegations of the existence of large-scale<br />

Devil-worship and satanic activities presently underway in America, the<br />

CSER has concluded that these allegations are tall pillars of nonsense built on<br />

the slippery sands ofunreason. It doesn't take too hard a shove to topple them<br />

(p.26).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!