29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

155<br />

Fairbairn, by deliberately employing the metaphor of possession to describe the<br />

phenomenology of psychopathology, re-establishes a respectful attitude to the<br />

experiential reality of demonic possession and exorcism, while not naively accepting the<br />

literal reality of any ecclesiastical worldview:<br />

It is to the realm of these bad objects, I feel convinced, rather than to the<br />

realm of the super-ego that the ultimate origin of all psychopathological<br />

developments is to be traced; for it may be said of all psychoneurotic and<br />

psychotic patients that, if a True Mass is being celebrated in the chancel, a<br />

Black Mass is being celebrated in the crypt. It becomes evident, accordingly,<br />

that the psychotherapist is the true successor to the exorcist, and that he is<br />

concerned, not only with the 'forgiveness of sins', but also with the 'casting<br />

out of devils' (Fairbairn, 1943, p. 70).<br />

Fairbairn (1943) comments briefly and critically on Freud's interpretation of the<br />

Haizmann case, using his contrasting perspective on the latter to demonstrate his point of<br />

departure from Freudian metapsychology. His main quarrel is with the drive discharge<br />

theory and its inability to illuminate the role played by internalised object relations in the<br />

genesis and maintenance of psychopathology: "There could be no better evidence of the<br />

misleading influence ofthe libido theory that even Freud should fail to appreciate the real<br />

significance ofdemoniacal possession after coming so near to doing so" 2 (1986, p. 114).<br />

For Freud, as was noted earlier, demons are sexual or aggressive impulse derivatives,<br />

melded in an unexplained fashion with paternal images, repressed and projected onto the<br />

external world where they are then perceived as external forces and entities. Fairbairn's<br />

central criticism of this formulation is that possession - and any form of functional<br />

psychopathology - involves the internalisation of bad object relationships, rather than the<br />

vicissitudes of instinctual derivatives:<br />

2 This observation was not included in the original 1943 version ofthis paper.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!