29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

271<br />

This situation perpetuated S's splitting defences, exacerbated by his father's apparent<br />

failure to maintain regular contact, and keep his promises to his son (6,7). The extent of<br />

the paternal part-object's badness was thus intensified by the father's neglectful behaviour,<br />

and S's protection of the idealised maternal object, by projecting his negative maternal<br />

experience onto the bad paternal object. Therefore, although his mother forced Christian<br />

religious instruction on him (16), S's childhood hostility toward Christianity appeared to<br />

be associated only with his deceitful father's self-professed Christian faith (7). God, the<br />

projected bad paternal part-object imago, was subsequently perceived by S to be an absent<br />

and uncaring figure (19).<br />

S thus entered adolescence with an internal world structured by critical and rejecting<br />

internal objects, and splitting defences erected to protect an idealised maternal part-object<br />

from his unconscious anger. As a consequence, his internal reality was dominated by a<br />

rejecting paternal part-object, onto which he projected his hatred, thereby establishing a<br />

punitive superego whose retaliatory attacks were experientially manifest as a sense of<br />

inferiority and self-hatred. S's paranoid orientation was strengthened by his social<br />

alienation, and belief that his peers rejected, ridiculed, and persecuted him (2,3). Having<br />

been an obedient child, S's world changed when, as an adolescent, he adopted a negative<br />

identity in order to win peer group acceptance (9,10). This strategy, however, aggravated<br />

his negative relationships with teachers, who were projectively identified with bad parental<br />

part-objects, and thus perceived as hated, abusive authority figures (13,14,15). His refusal<br />

to conform to their expectations of him resulted in him being regularly punished, and<br />

failing academically, which in turn fuelled his paranoia and underlying self-hatred.<br />

A hostile superego, a paranoid orientation, and the absence of a secure good internal<br />

object were conspicuous when S, as a young adult, felt lonely, rejected, friendless,<br />

directionless, and perceived life as meaningless. These factors, together with his rebellious<br />

behaviour, hatred of authority, and anger toward God - the supernatural projection of his<br />

bad paternal part-object - predisposed S to satanic involvement.<br />

271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!