29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186<br />

Jung's thoughts on Christianity and the archetypal significance of Satan in Western<br />

spirituality.<br />

11.1 Jung's definition of religious experience<br />

Despite his serious consideration of man's universal religious dimension, Jung was not<br />

concerned with the metaphysical issue of whether or not gods exist as transcendent<br />

external realities. Indeed, speaking of religious experiences, he says: "It will always<br />

remain doubtful whether what metaphysics and theology call God and the gods is the<br />

real ground of these experiences" (Jung, 1957a, p. 293). Jung's perspective is a<br />

phenomenological one insofar as subjective experience is regarded as primary,<br />

regardless ofwhether or not it corresponds with some objective reality. God, from this<br />

perspective, is thus "a psychic fact of immediate experience" (Jung, 1926, p. 328).<br />

Jung's definition of religious experience is vague, and he articulates it in terms of<br />

contact with a numinous dimension of existence. By numinous he means a<br />

compelling, enigmatic quality of experience, independent of one's will, which disrupts<br />

and transforms everyday waking consciousness:<br />

It seizes and controls the human subject, who is always rather its victim<br />

than its creator ..... The numinosum is either a quality belonging to a visible<br />

object or the influence of an invisible presence that causes a particular<br />

alteration ofconsciousness (Jung, 1940a, p. 7).<br />

In terms ofthis definition, any object or presence which awes or moves us deeply, and<br />

over which we have no conscious control, may be termed nurninous. Furthermore, one<br />

need not believe in any metaphysical entity called God, or subscribe to any type of<br />

religious dogma in order to experience this state ofreligious awareness. Jung is careful<br />

to distinguish between religion and creed, the latter which he defines as a "definite<br />

collective belief' (1957a, p. 257), and elsewhere as "codified and dogmatized forms of<br />

original religious experience" (1940, p. 9). His use ofthe word "victim" to denote the<br />

individual under sway of the nurninosum indicates that religious experience need not<br />

necessarily be ecstatic or benign, it may be frightening, intrusive and unwelcome. The<br />

significance ofthis is that the experience ofevil is not ruled out ofthis interpretation of<br />

nurninosity. Another ofJung's definitions ofreligion supports this claim:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!