29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

113<br />

Freud noted similar totemic aspects in young children's animal phobias, where an animal<br />

is irrationally feared for no apparent reason. The animal, argued Freud, is feared because<br />

it has become the displaced object of the child's patricidal fantasies, and the child<br />

unconsciously fears the animal-father's retaliation (1909, 1918). Thus oedipal fantasies<br />

regarding incestuous and parricidal wishes find their anthropological equivalent in<br />

totemic taboos and ritual practices. Freud, however, was not content with the analogy<br />

between childhood phobias and primitive religion, he sought to extend this argument to<br />

include the monotheistic religions as well. This he did by claiming that the totemic<br />

ancestor undergoes further displacement and evolution, with the hero as an intermediate<br />

figure, until it eventually becomes God (1913, 1921). The Eucharist thus functions as the<br />

Christian equivalent of the totem meal, and the crucifixion myth depicts the Christian<br />

equivalent of the sacramental slaying of the totemic father. The guilt associated with<br />

patricidal wishes and totem sacrifice is neurotic insofar as the human father does not<br />

literally die as a consequence of the son's fantasies. However, using an argument<br />

discredited by anthropologists, Freud (1913, 1925) suggested that an actual patricidal act<br />

did occur in humankind's primitive history, and that this is the source of collective guilt.<br />

In other words, not only personal history (ontogeny), but also the history of the human<br />

species (phylogeny), is implicated in religious belief: "There probably exists in the life of<br />

the individual, not only what he has experienced himself, but also what he brought with<br />

him at birth, fragments ofphylogenetic origin, an archaic heritage" (Freud, 1939, p.125).<br />

Freud's ideas on religious phylogeny derive from adopting Darwin's thesis that the<br />

original social organisation of humankind was the primal horde, in which one patriarch<br />

ruled strictly over the other males, and reserved access to the females for himself (Freud,<br />

1912-13). Exogamy was so instituted, and sexual relations prohibited within the clan.<br />

The patriarchal primal horde ended with an uprising by the younger males who killed and<br />

devoured the leader, an act wherein they "accomplished their identification with him '"<br />

and acquired a portion of his strength" (Freud, 1912-13, p. 141-2). Collective memories<br />

or some form of ideational content thus constitute in the human race a universal<br />

predisposition to guilt, and relief from this through the worship ofa sovereign deity: "The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!