29.12.2013 Views

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SATANIC CULT INVOLVEMENT: AN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328<br />

CHAPTER FIFTEEN<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Introduction<br />

The Results Chapter raises more Issues than can be considered in any detail. This<br />

discussion, as in the previous chapter, will consequently follow the structure provided by<br />

the five research questions, focusing selectively on the more interesting findings.<br />

Verbatim transcripts from individual interviews will be used to illustrate general<br />

observations. However, before discussing specific aspects of the research fmdings, it will<br />

be necessary to address the controversial issue ofthe research subjects' credibility, and the<br />

cogency ofthe researcher's interpretations ofthe interview narratives. After consideration<br />

of the five research questions, the chapter will conclude with a discussion of the concept<br />

of evil. It will be suggested that, despite the difficulties that depth psychology has with<br />

moral-theological concepts, the phenomenon of evil can be rendered intelligible within a<br />

depth psychology discourse.<br />

15.1 The "truth" of satanic cult involvement<br />

An obvious point to begin a discussion of these research findings is the issue of their<br />

truthfulness. The question of truth is relevant in two respects; firstly, have the subjects<br />

given truthful accounts oftheir experiences and, secondly, have the individual and general<br />

object relations interpretations uncovered the psychological truth ofthe subjects' accounts<br />

of satanic involvement? The first question concerns the validity ofsubjects' claims to have<br />

experienced and witnessed the events reported in their interviews, while the second<br />

concerns the validity of the psychoanalytic interpretations generated to make sense of the<br />

subjects' experiences. The first question is important in the light of wide-spread<br />

scepticism that satanic covens and their alleged activities are anything more than<br />

subversion myths, or the fanciful imaginings of psychologically disturbed individuals. As<br />

we have seen, the constructionist argument presented in Chapter Five aims to explain<br />

away reports of satanic· activity by claiming that these are elaborate social fictions or<br />

subversion narratives, which create an imaginary threat to serve as a scape-goat for a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!