DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...
DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...
DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“Emotionally I am much more prepared to allow my emotions to come through and I<br />
am now up to a point where I can recognise a feeling as it’s coming through and I can<br />
decide what I want to do with it.” (Interview 2, p.10)<br />
7.8 A Metaphor for Transformation: The Acorn and the Oak Tree<br />
In order to portray his experience of how crisis related to the development that<br />
he experienced over the same period, Guy used the metaphor of how an acorn must be<br />
destroyed in order for the shoot that is inside of it to blossom out of it:<br />
“The new me started to emerge. It’s like how the acorn drops from the oak but then<br />
turns to mulch and just when it looks like its destroyed, then something blossoms out<br />
of it, that to me seems like a very strong metaphor, because everything had to break<br />
away, everything had to be washed away and then the new me could emerge out of<br />
it.” (p.7)<br />
Guy suggests in this metaphor that there had to be a breaking away, a washing away,<br />
of the previous life structure, for the new one to take root. Positive growth simply<br />
couldn’t occur in the pre-crisis life structure, which is portrayed as the hard restrictive<br />
acorn in the metaphor. This had to be removed, and with it the narrow institutional<br />
identity that he had developed, for growth to happen in a directional sense. The<br />
evolving self that he experiences after the crisis is the blossoming tree in the<br />
metaphor. The metaphor demonstrates clearly that Guy perceives his crisis<br />
retrospectively as a developmentally formative episode with positive effects.<br />
7.9 Discussion<br />
Persona, Derealisation, Depersonalisation and Control<br />
Several metaphors used in Guy’s narrative relate to Laing’s theory of the<br />
persona/false self. Firstly, the metaphor of the self being “hijacked” is exactly the<br />
kind of phrase Laing suggested would be used to describe the experience of adopting<br />
a false self. A false self is constructed in accordance with the demands of others,<br />
therefore it is experienced as being under their control, leading to the strange<br />
experience of feeling as if the self has been “invaded” by an external force (Laing,<br />
1965). This then makes the self feel like it is controlled from without, leaving the<br />
person feeling he or she lacks a sense of self-determination. There is strong evidence<br />
in this narrative that the loss of the persona and a re-emerging sense of personal<br />
control are related. Guy links his post-crisis self that is no longer hijacked by the<br />
demands of others with a greater sense of personal control:<br />
135