02.01.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cognitive dissonance theory on a single UFO cult in Chicago who predicted global<br />

cataclysm on a specific data (Festinger, Riecken & Schacter, 1956). He predicted,<br />

based on his theory, that when the event did not occur, the members of the cult would<br />

not give up their beliefs, because the cognitive dissonance would be too<br />

uncomfortable, and may even strengthen their beliefs. His predictions were borne out<br />

and so the theory was supported. While describing this group within the nomothetic<br />

context of theory-testing, much idiographic detail emerged too and was reported in<br />

extensive detail.<br />

In sum, this thesis does not accept the traditional position that individuality<br />

and theory are antagonistic, but rather sees individuality and theory as<br />

complementary, and employs case-by-case theory generation, case-specific theory<br />

testing and within-case theory exemplification in order to grasp the nature of early<br />

adult crisis in its theoretical and individual forms.<br />

3.2 Between the Inductive / Hypothetico-Deductive Polarity<br />

The hypothetico-deductive approach to science is dominant across most forms<br />

of science, thanks to Karl Popper, whose influential philosophy is widely considered<br />

to be a gold standard for scientific investigation (Popper, 1959; Popper, 1972).<br />

Popper was attempting to solve the philosophical problem of scientific induction,<br />

which is the problem of how one can rationally justify jumping from particular<br />

observations of a limited sample to general conclusions for a larger population or<br />

universe of phenomena. He concluded that you can’t – it is a leap of faith, but that<br />

there is a way around it by the use of a hypothetico-deductive approach to science. In<br />

this approach one starts with a hypothesised prediction, and proceeds to test this<br />

hypothesis with data. One is then not working with the difficulties of induction,<br />

instead all one has to do is to make a deduction as to whether the hypothesis is<br />

supported or not. If the hypothesis is shown to be false, the theory is undermined. If<br />

repeated hypotheses are falsified, then the theory is rejected.<br />

Qualitative methods in the social sciences have been opposed to using the<br />

hypothetico-deductive approach to science, having found problems in its application.<br />

Much qualitative work is undertaken in an exploratory and open fashion on domains<br />

that are not well charted and understood, precisely in the theory-generation area that<br />

Popper overlooked. Popper had little to say on how theory was actually generated in<br />

order to extrapolate hypotheses for testing, other than stating it was through a process<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!