02.01.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.<br />

Generic Method and Study 1 Specifics<br />

5.1 Introduction<br />

Having described the sources and components of the composite methodology<br />

in the previous chapter, I now set out how the method was applied to this thesis. As<br />

stated in Chapter 2, three research questions provided the focus for the research:<br />

4. What does early adult crisis involve as an experience?<br />

5. Is there a common process underlying differing manifestations of early adult crisis?<br />

If so, what?<br />

6. Do early adult crises have a formative role in development of the self? If so, why?<br />

While these research questions remained constant and stable, the design of the<br />

empirical studies constantly evolved. Three empirical studies were conducted in total,<br />

the second and third of which were designed after completion of the preceding study,<br />

in order to focus on the most pressing and interesting findings from that prior study<br />

while addressing any limitations. The first half of this chapter presents those aspects<br />

of the method that were constant across all empirical work, and the second half<br />

presents methodological points that were specific to just the first empirical study, the<br />

findings of which are presented in the next chapter.<br />

Generic Method<br />

5.2 Ethical Concerns<br />

Ethical concerns were taken into account at all stages of the research process,<br />

to protect and respect the needs of participants and researcher. The project received<br />

departmental ethical approval prior to commencement of data collection. The research<br />

was aligned with the British Psychological Society Code of Conduct (March 2006<br />

version) and took into account the following points:<br />

1. Confidentiality was rigorously maintained; name and place identities on transcripts<br />

were changed and details of the respondent were kept in a confidential, locked<br />

location (article 1.2 in BPS Code of Conduct).<br />

2. The participant was given an information sheet that communicated the nature and<br />

purpose of the research prior to acceptance of participation (article 1.3 in BPS Code<br />

of Conduct) (see Appendix B).<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!