02.01.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of which represents a more complex representation of the self. They found advances<br />

in the complexity of self-representations as cognitive ability develops. The highest<br />

levels of self-representation were reached around the age of 50. All five levels are<br />

summarised in Table IV.<br />

Table IV. Labouvie-Vief et al.’s developmental levels of self-representation<br />

Level 1 Concrete Presystemic Simple and concrete descriptors. Traits are seen as<br />

global. No references to goals or psychological<br />

processes.<br />

Level 2 Interpersonal Protosystemic Evaluations are made that reflect the values of the<br />

immediate social group. Emphasis on features of the self<br />

that make for in-group acceptance<br />

Level 3 Institutional Intrasystemic Clearer sense of individuality within a group. Traits<br />

become more self-directed and goal-directed.<br />

Conventional goals, roles, values.<br />

Level 4 Contextual Intersystemic Descriptions are critical of convention, involve an<br />

awareness of how traits change, and give a sense of<br />

individuals with their own value system.<br />

Level 5 Dynamic Intersubjective Roles and traits are described at a complex level and<br />

reflect underlying motives that may be unconscious.<br />

Reference is to multiple dimensions of life history and an<br />

emphasis on process, becoming and emergence.<br />

Kegan (1982) also proposed a theory of the developing self which leads to<br />

qualitatively new, more complex, stages of self. In his formulation, the self reaches<br />

six successive new equilibriums, each one bringing a temporary balance to selfhood.<br />

Each successive stage is oriented towards being either independent or attached.<br />

The developmental sequence starts with the incorporative self, which<br />

corresponds to Piaget’s early sensori-motor period. Being prior to a self-world<br />

distinction, it is prior to any preference for being autonomous or attached. Next<br />

emerges the impulsive self, which is oriented towards inclusion in the mother-baby<br />

dyad, and there is no assertion of independence as yet. It is only with the command of<br />

one’s own impulses, through toilet training and early concrete operational thought that<br />

the imperial self is reached. Here we see the first push for independence away from<br />

parents. The imperial self is transcended by the interpersonal self with the onset of<br />

the formal operational period. This brings a new push for inclusion and popularity<br />

with adolescent peers. The interpersonal self then is replaced by the institutional self,<br />

which replaces the malleable interpersonal self with a more solid identity that<br />

maintains coherence across context, and is defined by roles that link the person to<br />

stable institutions. The interindividual self is the following stage, which once again<br />

swings back to inclusion and belonging, but in relationship to, rather than included in,<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!