02.01.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nonetheless it could also be argued that the qualitative methodology camp<br />

has contributed to its ongoing peripheral status by continued internal debate and<br />

arguments within itself. Discourse analysis, grounded theory, IPA, narrative<br />

analysis and other qualitative methods are often seen to be opposed; differences<br />

are magnified and reified while the inherent similarities that these methods share<br />

are lessened or ignored. Indeed there are even strong debates about the nature of<br />

each qualitative method, for example Glaser and Strauss’ ongoing disagreements<br />

about the nature of Grounded Theory (Glaser, 1992). This sense of opposition in<br />

the qualitative movement has fuelled inward-looking debates on the nature of<br />

knowledge, theory and analytical process, which has been undoubtedly valuable,<br />

but it may also have prevented a more outward-focused voice of the qualitative<br />

movement as a whole, leading to a lack of uptake of the new ideas across the<br />

discipline. Encouragingly though, a report in The Psychologist on the qualitative<br />

section of the 2007 British Psychological Society conference quoted a number of<br />

psychologists calling for a drawing together of qualitative psychology. Dr. Lucy<br />

Yardley described the importance of using qualitative methods in combination<br />

through a “composite analysis” approach and so moving towards qualitative<br />

integration. Prof. Robert Elliott stated that all qualitative analysis involves the<br />

same basic activities and that researchers should concentrate on the<br />

commonalities rather than differences. Prof. Jonathan Smith was also quoted at<br />

the same conference as describing how methodological exclusivity in qualitative<br />

psychology can be counterproductive, and that researchers can judiciously<br />

combine approaches to best serve the research problem in question (Haywood,<br />

2007).<br />

In this spirit of continuing the ongoing evolution of qualitative methods<br />

and following the trend towards methodological synthesis, a composite<br />

qualitative methodology is attempted in the current investigation. In biology<br />

there is a phenomenon called hybrid vigour, which describes the increased<br />

strength in offspring when two different breeds or sub-species are combined. It is<br />

hoped that something similar will be achieved here; by bringing the respective<br />

strengths of two different but compatible methods into a composite, the result is<br />

hoped to be a strong and adaptable hybrid. These two source methods are<br />

described below.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!