02.01.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“Having a crisis at the time is not in itself pathological. Indeed, the person who goes<br />

through this period with minimal discomfort may be denying that his life must<br />

change, for better or for worse. He is thus losing an opportunity for personal<br />

development.” (Levinson, 1978, p.26)<br />

“Finally, a developmental crisis is not solely negative. It may have both benefits and<br />

costs. The potential costs involve anguish and pain for oneself, hurt to others, and a<br />

less satisfactory life structure. The potential benefits involve the formation of a life<br />

structure more suitable for the self and more viable in the world.” (Levinson, 1996,<br />

p.35-36)<br />

Gail Sheehy (1977) also links crisis to development. She conducted over a hundred<br />

eight-hour interviews in order to gain the data that informed her lifespan development<br />

theory. She sees psychological growth as a risky process that requires the intentional<br />

cessation of safe, familiar patterns of behaviour and thought. She has a forthright<br />

conclusion on the place of crisis in development:<br />

“If I’ve been convinced by one idea in the course of collecting all the life stories that<br />

inform the book, it is this: Times of crisis, of disruption or constructive change, are<br />

not only predictable but desirable. They mean growth.” (Sheehy, 1977, p.31)<br />

None of the writers on crisis suggest that crisis is necessary, but Levinson goes so far<br />

as to say he has never met a single person in his research or personal who has avoided<br />

one by the age of 65 (Levinson, 1996).<br />

A phenomenological study of the effects of crisis on people’s lives found three<br />

effects of crisis transitions on the persons involved (Denne and Thomson, 1991).<br />

Firstly, it was found that after the crisis the individuals changed from a sense of<br />

external control to a sense of internal control and agency, and thus developed a more<br />

proactive and self-reliant approach to life. A second shift was an acceptance of the<br />

less positive aspects of the self, while accepting previously suppressed emotions into<br />

consciousness. Thirdly a move towards congruence between inner sense of self and<br />

lifestyle was found, in an effort to live without a schism between self and world. This<br />

led to what the authors termed “a progression towards a balanced relation between<br />

self and world.” (1991, p.123)<br />

Two psychological concepts that are closely related to crisis, trauma and<br />

stress, have also been linked to developmental repercussions. Crisis differs from the<br />

related concept of trauma, in that trauma is an acute, externally triggered event<br />

whereas crisis is an episode with both inner and outer precipitating factors (Lazarus,<br />

2000). Stress refers to the state of unpleasant tension due to high levels of<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!