02.01.2014 Views

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

DEVELOPMENTAL CRISIS IN EARLY ADULTHOOD: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Participant Feedback Exercise<br />

Yardley (2000) and Miles and Huberman (1994) suggest that a participant<br />

validation exercise can enhance both credibility and sensitivity of a qualitative<br />

research project. In line with this advice, an exercise was conducted towards the end<br />

of the duration of the current project. Participants were given the opportunity to give<br />

feedback on whether they considered the final model to reflect their episode of crisis<br />

or not. A version of Chapter 9 with names and direct quotes removed was sent to all<br />

22 participants as an attachment to an email, with questions about it directly<br />

embedded into the email. Email was chosen as it was up to two years since some<br />

interviews were given and the location of participants was uncertain. It was also<br />

considered that it would get a higher response rate than a short interview as it would<br />

be a quicker and easier process. Also, email perhaps allow an extra candour and time<br />

for consideration than face-to-face interaction.<br />

14 participants out of 22 gave feedback. Violet responded to say that she did<br />

not have time to fill out the feedback as she was in the middle of her first solo art<br />

exhibition and was extremely busy. A follow up email several weeks later elicited no<br />

response. There was no email response at all from the remaining participants.<br />

Questions that were in the email are listed in Appendix G. These questions<br />

were aimed at gaining both categorical and more in-depth information on how the<br />

participants felt about the model in relation to their own crisis. The document and<br />

email were explicit that this was a provisional model that was open to change and<br />

disputation. Question 1 was a question that asked for an overall appraisal of the<br />

model in reference to their experience:<br />

1. To what extent do you think the model works as a summary and simplified representation<br />

of your experience of crisis?<br />

Strongly agree ---- agree --- disagree --- strongly disagree (please delete as appropriate)<br />

The responses to this question were positive, with 8 individuals rating Strongly Agree,<br />

6 individuals rating Agree, and 0 participants rating disagree or strongly disagree.<br />

Question 2 then asked whether each of the four phases of the model applied to<br />

their experience of crisis, with a simple yes/no answer for each phase.<br />

2. There are four phases in the model. Please say whether you think each one applies to<br />

you.<br />

First Phase: commitment, constriction, frustration, extrinsic motivation (Yes/No)<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!