16.06.2015 Views

africa

africa

africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Africa at a Fork in the Road: Taking Off or Disappointment Once Again?<br />

on international bond markets, and taking the risk of spending for short-run, politically<br />

expedient gain, rather than investing in long-term growth as a future source<br />

of (tax) revenue. Of course, the potentially massive financial resources associated<br />

with natural resource finds could be invested to create the infrastructure and human<br />

capital that drives future growth and poverty reduction. But without clear political<br />

interest and commitment to this kind of future, such wealth will not be handled well,<br />

and the signs are not encouraging. 4<br />

19.5 Making aid work<br />

In this environment, aid does not self-evidently provide development. Moreover, larger<br />

flows from international capital markets, emerging powers, and natural-resourcebacked<br />

loans and revenues mean that aid is becoming a relatively less important<br />

source of financing. This does not mean that governments in Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

are not interested in receiving aid or concessional loans; rather that the usual policy<br />

conditions (whether ex-post or ex-ante) that donors attach to aid are becoming even<br />

less effective. More and more, as alternative ways of financing investment plans<br />

become available, a sense of partnership and shared commitment by the different<br />

parties involved is vital for aid to be effective.<br />

If donors want to see their aid used for promoting growth and poverty reduction,<br />

and if we are right that the political economy in many Sub-Saharan African countries<br />

does not favor this, what then should be the role of development aid? We offer five<br />

general ideas and principles.<br />

First, it is important to be willing to work more selectively. The return to aid in terms<br />

of growth and poverty reduction will be higher if recipient countries are actively trying<br />

to create a climate that favors growth and poverty reduction. While it is broadly<br />

accepted that there could be various ways to be aligned with growth and poverty<br />

reduction (and that we might not necessarily be able to judge this alignment easily),<br />

the opposite case, of predatory states in which elites focus on extracting rents<br />

from society, is familiar and recognizable. In such states, merely behaving as if aid<br />

can be apolitical—as is done at times by some multilateral agencies, or indeed by<br />

China—is effectively itself a political choice that favors the current political settlement<br />

irrespective of its role in broader development.<br />

347

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!