16.06.2015 Views

africa

africa

africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Yale Center for the Study of Globalization<br />

percent. Real income per person has also increased—by more than 30 percent in<br />

the last decade. Post-conflict countries posted growth of 6.6 percent while fragile<br />

states grew by 3.6 percent over the same period. There has been improvement in<br />

key welfare indicators as well. Poverty rates are falling, though still high. Between<br />

1999 and 2012, Africa’s average poverty rate fell from 58 percent to 43 percent.<br />

Second, it is incontestable that Africa’s growth is happening with no meaningful<br />

structural transformation. There is no reallocation of resources from low productivity<br />

areas to high productivity areas.<br />

Third, the factors that are driving African growth are well known. Some of these<br />

include increased population growth with attendant increased aggregate demand,<br />

and macroeconomic management that has tremendously improved, compared<br />

to a decade ago, and has largely come with supportive policies for private sector<br />

growth. Instances of political instability have been drastically reduced in the continent.<br />

Political governance and the rule of law have been strengthened and this<br />

has increased economic accountability. Africa has been opening up to international<br />

trade and investment. Natural resources are booming, notably as the result of the<br />

demand for minerals and oil from Asian countries, including China. We also see<br />

greater regional economic integration and improved inflows including of foreign<br />

direct investment and remittances.<br />

2.2 Constraints on growth<br />

But masked in the growth story are what one could call Schumpeterian forces working<br />

behind the scenes and affecting Africa’s growth. First, Africa is starting from a<br />

disadvantaged position on several fronts due to the effects of colonial rule. One of<br />

these is ethnic fragmentation, which started with the colonialists. Recruitment into<br />

the military and civil service by the colonial masters largely followed ethnic leanings,<br />

with those groups who were considered allied to the colonialists given privileged<br />

access to education and administration. This was the case with the Kamba in Kenya,<br />

Tiv in Nigeria, and Acholi in Uganda. Those who were considered less cooperative<br />

were neglected and punished for being unruly and generally left out of government<br />

(Young, 1994). Ethnic fragmentation has continued to haunt Africa to date.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!