16.06.2015 Views

africa

africa

africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Yale Center for the Study of Globalization<br />

the dashboard avoids the arbitrary weights that are needed to aggregate across<br />

the rows, it still must choose weights to aggregate down each column. By refusing<br />

to weight across the columns, the dashboard approach leaves open the possibility<br />

of finding, say, that GDP per capita has grown by 10 percent while formal sector<br />

employment has declined by 1 percent. Is that inclusive growth? What if GDP<br />

growth is 5 percent and formal employment growth is 1 percent? It may be that<br />

policymakers view such results and apply their own preferred weights to conclude<br />

that growth has been inclusive, and vary those weights as they see fit. Insisting on<br />

an index with fixed weights removes this “wiggle room.”<br />

Practically it may be that, presented with a wide range of indicators—a really comprehensive<br />

dashboard—policymakers, the press, and even analysts will focus on<br />

only one or a few. The highest-profile dashboard approach is the Millennium Development<br />

Goals, which include eight goals and twenty one targets, along with about<br />

seventy specific indicators suggested to measure those targets. Since the goals are<br />

“mash-ups” of the targets, a proper MDG dashboard should include at least the 21<br />

targets and perhaps the 70 indicators. But even though almost all the MDG targets<br />

are readily measured, and some (e.g. reducing the dollar-a-day headcount by 50<br />

percent; eliminating gender disparities in primary and secondary education) are<br />

followed closely, others (e.g. reducing biodiversity loss; achieving decent employment<br />

for men, women, and young people) are barely noticed. Given the option to<br />

evaluate many indicators, we may choose to focus only on some. The dashboard<br />

allows one to assign an implicit weight of zero to some of its variables. An index at<br />

least forces their inclusion with some positive weight.<br />

6.3 Towards an index of inclusive growth<br />

As noted above, AfDB defines inclusive growth as economic growth that results in<br />

wider access to sustainable socioeconomic opportunities for a broader number of<br />

people, regions or countries, while protecting the vulnerable, all being done in an<br />

environment of fairness, equal justice, and political plurality.<br />

Inclusive growth is important for ethical considerations of fairness. Growth must be<br />

shared and should be inclusive across different segments of populations. Growth with<br />

persistent inequalities may endanger social peace, force the poor and unemployed<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!