16.06.2015 Views

africa

africa

africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Africa at a Fork in the Road: Taking Off or Disappointment Once Again?<br />

The first is a conventional royalty on production, typically in the region of 5 percent<br />

of production value. Once this has been taken, the operator recovers operating and<br />

development costs, usually up to a contract ceiling, with un-recovered costs carried<br />

forward. 12 The residual profit is then shared between the operator and government:<br />

this constitutes the second element of revenue. Third, government taxes the profits<br />

of the operator and levies withholding taxes on various contractor payments and<br />

dividends.<br />

The final element of income from the resource stems from dividends arising from<br />

government equity participation in the project. There is a question of how government<br />

acquires this equity. Fully paid up shares may be expensive to acquire—a 20<br />

percent equity share may cost government US$4 billion to US$5 billion—so it is<br />

more likely that government acquires a “carried interest equity stake” under which<br />

the contractor finances the government share and recoups this loan (with interest)<br />

from future revenue to government, necessarily reducing the rate at which rents<br />

accrue to government.<br />

24.3.4 The scale of the revenue: substantial but not transformative<br />

Given that myriad uncertainties surround the gas market over the coming decade, the<br />

capital and operating costs associated with extracting natural gas from the Tanzanian<br />

fields and, indeed, the precise form of the gas contracts eventually negotiated, it is<br />

extremely hard to estimate with any precision the expected scale of revenues likely<br />

to accrue to government. The IMF (2014) has offered a tentative projection based<br />

on a two-train production facility operating at the lower bound of current revenue<br />

projections (Figure 24.3). This sees total revenues rising to around US$3 billion<br />

per year around a decade from now and remaining at that level for approximately<br />

15 years. The profile for a four-train production facility, which would be justified if<br />

proven reserves come in towards the top end of current estimates, generates a<br />

similarly shaped revenue profile that plateaus at around US$6 billion per year. The<br />

up-front capital cost of the four-train facility is estimated at US$46 billion in current<br />

prices, with attendant implications for the cost of government’s equity participation.<br />

Revenues of this scale would be equivalent to several percentage points of Tanzania’s<br />

(non-resource) GDP at the peak of production. They will not, on current projec-<br />

425

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!