11.07.2015 Views

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>12th</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Symposium</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Heating</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cooling</strong>,September 5 th to September 7 th , 2010, Tallinn, Est<strong>on</strong>ia50 % solar fracti<strong>on</strong> of the total heating dem<strong>and</strong> withouta thermal storage system [scenario 3].For the thermal storage a hot water system isassumed, because those are state of the art <strong>and</strong> canbe used in most applicati<strong>on</strong>s. Other systems havemore specific requirements to the geological situati<strong>on</strong>of the area. A geothermal heat storage for exampledoes not work in an area with a flow of the groundwater. For the simulati<strong>on</strong> of scenario 2 a smallerthermal storage compared to scenario 1 was assumed,because there is no necessity for a seas<strong>on</strong>al heatstorage system.For the simulati<strong>on</strong> model a commercial solar collectorwas taken (s. Table 3). It is a flat plate collector with aanti-reflecti<strong>on</strong> glass <strong>and</strong> a gross area of about 2,6 m².Its efficiency is 84,4 % (calculated according to EN12975). The simulati<strong>on</strong> uses specific given parameters.Those are shown in Table 3.Table 3: used input parameters for solar simulati<strong>on</strong>Annual heating energy(calculated with givenmethod)Flow temperature 67 °CReturn temperature 45 °CSlope of collector 55°Azimuth of buildingType of collectorStorage capacityHeat exchangerefficiencyMiscellaneous lossesPump efficiency(for grid integrati<strong>on</strong>)Time periodScenario 1: 1076 MWhScenario 2: 493 MWhScenario 3: 1071 MWhScenario 4: 11,6 MWhScenario 5: 11,6 MWh-45° (southeast)WagnerSolar L20 ARScenario 1: 1000 l/m²Scenario 2: 100 l/m²Scenario 3: 1 l/m²Scenario 4: 100 l/m²Scenario 5: 10 l/m²80 %5 % if storage is used(smaller grid)8 % if integrated intolarge grid40 %20 yearInternal rate of return Scenario 1: 8,5 %Scenario 2: 8,5 %Scenario 3: 8,5 %Scenario 4: 5,0 %Scenario 5: 5,0 %Increase of heat price per 2 %yearFinancial support 30 %For a comparis<strong>on</strong> of the different scenarios the heatcost per kWh were calculated.The calculati<strong>on</strong> of the emissi<strong>on</strong>s is based <strong>on</strong> theoperati<strong>on</strong> of the system <strong>and</strong> not <strong>on</strong> its total life cycle.For solar thermal heat the CO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong>ly arisefrom the used electricity for the necessary pumps.Included in the calculati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>ly the pump energy forthe solar thermal collectors <strong>and</strong>, if necessary, toincrease the pressure for the integrati<strong>on</strong> into theheating grid flow pipe. The CO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s for theGerman electricity grid are given with 506 g/kWh.For the calculati<strong>on</strong> without a thermal storage system[scenario 3] it was assumed that the produced solarheat can directly be distributed throughout a districtheating network. This would make it possible to savethe investments of a seas<strong>on</strong>al heat storage system <strong>and</strong>also reduce the losses within the thermal storagesystem.For those calculati<strong>on</strong>s the same heat amount was usedthan in scenario 2. But in this case it is not possible tocover 50 % of the heat dem<strong>and</strong> of the total grid. Just asmall amount, for example the losses of the grid <strong>and</strong>the base load, can be produced with solar thermaltechnologies without a thermal storage.Another opti<strong>on</strong> would be to integrate small systems intothe district heating grid. In this case the operator of thegrid would not run the facility by itself. The heatproducer could use a solar thermal collector for its ownheat dem<strong>and</strong> but without a thermal storage system.Instead of using an in-house thermal storage (what isgetting very large if a seas<strong>on</strong>al heat storage system isused) the heating grid could be used. For the singlehouse technology an internal rate of return of 5 % wasused for the ec<strong>on</strong>omic calculati<strong>on</strong> (average percentageof building credit [4]). Furthermore the financial supportis a little different because of different regulati<strong>on</strong>s forlarge <strong>and</strong> small systems. In the following those twocalculati<strong>on</strong>s are named ―scenario 4‖ for the heatproducti<strong>on</strong> of a single-family house with a thermalstorage <strong>and</strong> ―scenario 5‖ for the calculati<strong>on</strong> without athermal storage.Summary of different scenarios:Scenario 1 Solar fracti<strong>on</strong> of 50%Seas<strong>on</strong>al thermal storage includedScenario 2100% heat producti<strong>on</strong> of hot tap waterBuffer heat storage included, but no seas<strong>on</strong>althermal storage135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!