11.07.2015 Views

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>12th</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Symposium</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Heating</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cooling</strong>,September 5 th to September 7 th , 2010, Tallinn, Est<strong>on</strong>iaCONCLUSIONThe main c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s from the analysis were:Fig. 8 Average heat use in multi-family buildings inrelati<strong>on</strong> to the measures performed. The measure figurescorresp<strong>on</strong>d to the measures defined in the text.Individual variati<strong>on</strong>s dominate compared tosystematic causes regarding the specific heatuse in multi-family <strong>and</strong> service sector buildings.The district heating companies can help theircustomers by identifying them as high, mediumor low users of heat.On the short term, a significant potential existsfor lower heat use in the Swedish multi-family<strong>and</strong> service sector buildings.More efficient heat use in buildings will probablyrepresent the most important competitor todistrict heating supply in the future.Fig. 9 Average heat use in service sector premises inrelati<strong>on</strong> to the measures performed. The measure figurescorresp<strong>on</strong>d to the measures defined in the text.As shown in the figures 8 <strong>and</strong> 9, there were nosubstantial differences in heat use between buildingswhere energy-saving measures had been taken <strong>and</strong>those where they had not. The c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> from thisanalysis is that the measures taken during these 10years were taken by late-comers rather than by earlyadopters, since heat use after measures were takengenerally corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to the average level for allbuildings.In the Swedish energy efficiency debate, manyvoices refer to systematic causes for high heatuse. However, the results from this study do notsupport this opini<strong>on</strong>, since the distributi<strong>on</strong> ofheat use mostly comes from individual causes.The most important implicati<strong>on</strong> of the studyresults is then that systematic policy measureswill have a low impact <strong>on</strong> total nati<strong>on</strong>al energyefficiency.REFERENCES[1] Statistics Sweden, Energistatistik förflerbostadshus 2006 (Energy statistics for multifamilyhouses during 2006). StatistiskaMeddel<strong>and</strong>en EN16SM0702.[2] Statistics Sweden, Energistatistik för lokaler 2006(Energy statistics for premises during 2006).Statistiska Meddel<strong>and</strong>en EN16SM0703.[3] Andreass<strong>on</strong> M, Borgström M, WernerS, Värmeanvändning i flerbostadshus och lokaler(Heat use in multi-family buildings <strong>and</strong> premises2006) Fjärrsyn report 2009:4, Stockholm 2009.Available at www.svenskfjarrvarme.se276

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!