11.07.2015 Views

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

12th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>12th</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Symposium</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Heating</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cooling</strong>,September 5 th to September 7 th , 2010, Tallinn, Est<strong>on</strong>iaresults from a point of time within these more generalresults over a period of time. Since the CO 2 reducti<strong>on</strong>target of the two bounding scenarios [scenario 15%reducti<strong>on</strong> (2020) <strong>and</strong> scenario 40% reducti<strong>on</strong> (2020)]clearly differ in the mid-term periods of 2020 <strong>and</strong> 2030(Table 1) <strong>and</strong> the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding prices are moredifferent in these periods (Figure 3), the energy systemshows the most variati<strong>on</strong>s during this time.To show the development over the modelled timeperiod, first of all the net electricity generati<strong>on</strong> of EU-27is displayed (Figure 4). The overall electricitygenerati<strong>on</strong> remains almost c<strong>on</strong>stant at 2010 levels(about 3 200 TWh) until 2030. In later periods, there isa clear increase in electricity generati<strong>on</strong> up to4 255 TWh (2050, scenario CO2_110). The increase inthe later periods is driven by str<strong>on</strong>ger emissi<strong>on</strong>reducti<strong>on</strong> targets. To fulfil the restricti<strong>on</strong>s, moreelectricity with low specific emissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> high end useefficiency in the dem<strong>and</strong> sectors is used.According to the given CO 2 prices of the two scenarios(CO2_010 <strong>and</strong> CO2_110), the main differences occurin the mid term periods. While the total electricitydem<strong>and</strong> in 2020 is lower in the scenario with higheremissi<strong>on</strong> certificate prices (-22 TWh in 2020 betweenCO2_110 <strong>and</strong> CO2_010), the dem<strong>and</strong> is higher by86 TWh in 2030. The increase is due to the use ofmore efficient technologies in the end use sectorsresulting in lower electricity dem<strong>and</strong> in 2020, while by2030 the switch to electricity based technologies to fulfilthe emissi<strong>on</strong> restricti<strong>on</strong>s has already taken place.Net electricity generati<strong>on</strong> [TWh]450040003500300025002000150010005000StatisticCO2_010CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_1102000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050Figure 4: Net electricity generati<strong>on</strong> in the EU-27Others / Wasten<strong>on</strong>-ren.OtherRenewablesBiomass /Waste ren.SolarWindHydroNuclearNatural gasOilLigniteAside from the changes in the total electricity dem<strong>and</strong>,there is also a change in the structure of the electricitygenerati<strong>on</strong>. At higher CO 2 prices, less coal (-120 TWhfrom coal fired power plants in 2030) <strong>and</strong> more gas(+44 TWh) <strong>and</strong> nuclear (+30 TWh) are used <strong>and</strong> moreelectricity from renewable energy sources (+35 TWhfrom wind, +56 TWh from biomass <strong>and</strong> renewablewaste) is generated. Furthermore, CCS is used morewidely under the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of the CO2_110 scenario in2030 compared to CO2_010.CoalThe electricity generati<strong>on</strong> from CHP plants in the EU27increases by 79% from about 380 TWh in the year2000 to 640 TWh by the year 2020 (see Figure 4). Theextensi<strong>on</strong> of the electricity generati<strong>on</strong> from CHP plantsis essentially supported by gas-fired <strong>and</strong> biomassbased CHP plants. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, existing public CHPplants with an extracti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>densing turbine aresubstituted by CHP plants with a higher power-to-heatratio <strong>and</strong> there is also an extensi<strong>on</strong> of industrial CHPplants, which are often used in cooperati<strong>on</strong> withcommunal facilities. The intermediate growth of CHPplants in the commercial sector between the years2015 <strong>and</strong> 2035 are based <strong>on</strong> efficiency advantages ofCHP plants with a medium sized internal combusti<strong>on</strong>gas engine. In the l<strong>on</strong>g term, the limited possibilities ofusing CO 2 free fuels in commercial CHPs will result inthese phasing out in the commercial sector. Until theyear 2050 the electricity producti<strong>on</strong> by CHP plants inthe scenarios further increases up to a level of 1055 to1100 TWh. CHP plants based <strong>on</strong> biomass as well asCCS CHP are an important opti<strong>on</strong> in the year 2050.Net electricity generati<strong>on</strong> CHP in [TWh]1200.001000.00800.00600.00400.00200.000.00CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_110CO2_010CO2_1102000 2005.0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050Figure 5: Net electricity generati<strong>on</strong> CHP by sector in theEU-27In additi<strong>on</strong> to the net electricity generati<strong>on</strong>, the primary(Figure 6) <strong>and</strong> final energy (Figure 7) c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> ofthe EU-27 are also analysed over the whole timeperiod. Overall, the primary energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> (PEC)does not show clear changes <strong>and</strong> remains at a level ofabout 75 000 PJ. The lowest total PEC occurs in themid-term periods. The total c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> is influencedby an increasing efficiency till 2030 <strong>and</strong> later <strong>on</strong> by ahigher share of renewables <strong>and</strong> also CCS which bothlead to a higher c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> due to the lower thermalefficiency in the combusti<strong>on</strong> processes.Looking at the impact of the single energy carriers,there is a distinct change between the two scenariosthan in the total sum of the PEC. In 2030 at a higherCO 2 price, less coal (-1 675 PJ) <strong>and</strong> petroleumproducts (-881 PJ) <strong>and</strong> more Hydro, wind, solar(+338 PJ) <strong>and</strong> other renewables +4856 PJ) (mainlybiomass) are used.PublicComercialIndustry232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!