30.12.2012 Views

Superconducting Technology Assessment - nitrd

Superconducting Technology Assessment - nitrd

Superconducting Technology Assessment - nitrd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Another issue is the cost of the refrigeration. Buildings and infrastructure may be a major cost factor for large<br />

amounts of refrigeration. Effort should be made to reduce the refrigeration at 4 K and at higher temperatures since<br />

the cost (infrastructure and ownership) is direct function of the amount of heat to be removed.<br />

One key issue is the availability of manufacturers. The largest manufacturer of 4 K coolers is Sumitomo in Japan,<br />

which has bought out all of its competitors except for Cryomech. No American company has made a large helium<br />

refrigerator or liquefier in the last 10 years; the industrial capacity to manufacture large helium plants ended with<br />

the <strong>Superconducting</strong>-Super-Collider in 1993. Development funding may be needed for U.S. companies to insure<br />

that reliable domestic coolers will be available in the future. Development of an intermediate-sized cooler (between<br />

small laboratory-scale devices and large helium liquefiers) would be desirable to enable a system with multiple<br />

processor modules.<br />

6.4.4 COOLING – ROADMAP AND FUNDING<br />

A roadmap for the development of cryocoolers for an SCE-based, large-scale computer is shown in figure below.<br />

The funding profile needed to maintain development pace is listed in the accompanying table. More details are<br />

presented in Appendix L: Multi-Chip Modules and Boards. (The full text of this appendix can be found on the CD<br />

accompanying this report.)<br />

126<br />

I.<br />

Trade -<br />

offs<br />

1.<br />

Cryo<br />

Req<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

2. Cryo<br />

Test Bench<br />

Design<br />

2.<br />

Cryo<br />

Test<br />

Bench<br />

3. Cryo<br />

Test Bench<br />

Fabrication<br />

and Qual<br />

3.<br />

Cryo<br />

Test<br />

Bench<br />

qualified<br />

4. Prototype<br />

Design<br />

4.<br />

Prototype<br />

Cryocooler<br />

5. Prototype<br />

Fab and Test<br />

MILESTONES<br />

5.<br />

Prototype<br />

qualified<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

TABLE 6-6. COOLER DEVELOPMENT COSTS ($M)<br />

Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total<br />

Cooler Development 1.3 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.6 4.5<br />

Total Investment 1.3 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.6 4.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!