Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
* 1.1.2 THE LIMITS OF THE SUBJECT *<br />
Nowadays it is almost impossible to write a scientific work without<br />
limiting oneself, as the risk <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering too many data in a disorderly<br />
manner is too big. <strong>The</strong>refore, I limit myself to one specific field in<br />
rock art, the abstract group <strong>of</strong> petroglyphs <strong>of</strong> the so called cup-<strong>and</strong>ring<br />
art in Europe, comprising mostly circular motifs carved out <strong>of</strong><br />
natural rock surfaces. <strong>The</strong> great majority belongs to the Neolithic<br />
period; the New Stone Age. This brings me to the issue <strong>of</strong> the dating.<br />
* 1.1.2.1 <strong>The</strong> dating <strong>of</strong> this specific art form is still<br />
controversial. Unfortunately, for European petroglyphs there is no<br />
absolute dating available. To my knowledge, only one cupule in Europe<br />
has been tentatively dated by microerosion analysis, <strong>and</strong> this example,<br />
from the Rupe Magna, Valtellina, Italy, turned out to be executed or at<br />
least re-worked in the historical period (Bednarik 1997: 18). It is<br />
almost imperative to obtain absolute dates for European cupules <strong>and</strong><br />
cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings (for instance by way <strong>of</strong> microerosion analysis) in order to<br />
establish a sound chronology for European rock art.<br />
By the end <strong>of</strong> 1980 most researchers were convinced that cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
art was mainly a Bronze Age feature. This assumption was mainly based<br />
on rather circumstantial evidence, like the scant occurrence <strong>of</strong> cup<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
slabs in British Bronze Age burial cists. This theory was<br />
increasingly attacked (Burgess 1990) <strong>and</strong> up to date most scholars<br />
accept a Late Neolithic date for these engravings. However, I for one<br />
am convinced that cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art slowly evolved from very early<br />
simple r<strong>and</strong>om cupules (for an example see Fig. 78) to sophisticated<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> skilfully engraved multiple rings (for an example see Fig. 126).<br />
In my opinion, cupules would then have been introduced to the Atlantic<br />
seaboard <strong>of</strong> Western Europe by the end <strong>of</strong> the Mesolithic,<br />
approximately 6000 BC, whereas the florescence <strong>of</strong> the big sets <strong>of</strong><br />
concentric rings took place in the later part <strong>of</strong> the Neolithic, around<br />
3000 BC, coinciding with the upheaval <strong>of</strong> the megalithic art in Irel<strong>and</strong>.<br />
In the final stages <strong>of</strong> the Neolithic I assume that the radial groove<br />
was introduced; a line from the centre leading out <strong>of</strong> the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring.<br />
It is almost certain that with the introduction <strong>of</strong> the Bronze Age the<br />
cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art tradition went extinct. Thus a period <strong>of</strong> about 4000<br />
years (from 6000 BC to 2000 BC) limits the era <strong>of</strong> the cupule tradition<br />
<strong>and</strong> the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring tradition in western Europe. If you wish to read<br />
more about the chronology <strong>and</strong> dating <strong>of</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art first, you<br />
may care to read a section in Chapter 3.<br />
* 1.1.2.2 <strong>The</strong> most characteristic element <strong>of</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong> ring art<br />
<strong>and</strong> probably also the oldest surviving motif (see, however, Bednarik<br />
1996) is the cupule (Fig. 41), also called cupmark or cup. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
petroglyphs comprise small bowl-shaped depressions ground or chiselled<br />
out <strong>of</strong> the rock, ranging from 1 to 10 cm <strong>and</strong> averaging 5 cm in diameter<br />
<strong>and</strong> about 0.5 to 10 cm deep (larger depressions are called basins).<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 5<br />
GEOGRAPHY