Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
� CHAPTER 1.5 �<br />
SCANDINAVIA<br />
� INTRODUCTION �<br />
Although Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia is one <strong>of</strong> the four major post-glacial rock art<br />
regions in Europe (the other three being the British Isles, the Iberian<br />
peninsula <strong>and</strong> the Alpine region), it is almost exclusively treated as a<br />
separate unit in the existing literature. This is mainly because its rock<br />
art is so distinctly different from the other rock art regions. Most<br />
characteristic are the thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nordic boat engravings <strong>and</strong><br />
human figures, <strong>of</strong>ten carrying<br />
weapons. Many animals, solar<br />
representations <strong>and</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />
cupules also occur.<br />
But apart from the ubiquitous<br />
cupule (Fig. 88; note the cupule at<br />
the bottom with a faint ring)<br />
there is one abstract motif that<br />
links Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia with all other<br />
major rock art regions in Europe.<br />
This is the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring motif.<br />
It is necessary, however, to<br />
distinguish between a cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
FIG. 88: STÖLE CUPULES.<br />
motif <strong>and</strong> the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring symbol.<br />
<strong>The</strong> motif appears world-wide (Chapter 3), as an element within the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> several rock art traditions, having a variable meaning in each<br />
specific culture. <strong>The</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring symbol however, only appears in the<br />
typical cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art tradition belonging to the European Neolithic.<br />
<strong>The</strong> true meaning <strong>of</strong> this symbol is still obscure, however.<br />
<strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this chapter is a major controversy in this respect:<br />
should the Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring configuration be regarded just as<br />
a motif, as a minor element within the Bronze Age rock art repertoire,<br />
or does it represent the major symbol <strong>of</strong> the important Neolithic rock<br />
art tradition, which possibly also diffused to Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia, being part <strong>of</strong><br />
a pan-European religion ?<br />
Unfortunately, in the past there has been little or no attention for the<br />
position <strong>of</strong> the Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring motif, <strong>and</strong> as a result the<br />
possibility that the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring motif represents a Neolithic symbol in<br />
the Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian rock art repertoire, has been ignored. In most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
studies dealing with Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian rock art, the emphasis clearly <strong>and</strong><br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ably is on the overwhelming iconic material. Even studies<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 111<br />
GEOGRAPHY