Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
* 2.2.1.1.1 GAYLES MOOR *<br />
Site B3 on Gayles Moor is a small rock exposed for 110 by 55 cm <strong>and</strong><br />
has two levels that are decorated. Clearly one part <strong>of</strong> the rock has<br />
been removed (stippled on Fig. 139). Although the size <strong>of</strong> the removed<br />
part is not too small to suggest prehistoric quarrying (for the use as a<br />
cist slab ?), this is not at all certain. <strong>The</strong> removal could namely also<br />
have been caused by the execution <strong>of</strong> the petroglyphs causing the<br />
already friable rock to flake <strong>of</strong>f. It is nonetheless remarkable, that<br />
after the removal <strong>of</strong> the piece, whether accidental on intentional, one<br />
decided to execute a new design on the newly exposed surface.<br />
Even when the piece was quarried on purpose, it remains doubtful<br />
whether the art is an example <strong>of</strong> “re-sanctification”. This is a matter<br />
<strong>of</strong> chronology <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> semantics. <strong>The</strong> re-decoration could have taken<br />
place immediately after the piece was removed in which case there is<br />
no question <strong>of</strong> “re-sanctification”. Alternatively, the new motifs could<br />
have been executed a long period after the rock was quarried <strong>and</strong> only<br />
then this event just possibly could be interpreted as a sort <strong>of</strong> “resanctification”,<br />
but again, I consider this to be a normal practice in<br />
the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring tradition.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is another problem, however. If quarrying indeed took place, it<br />
must have had a reason. It is therefore suggested that the “quarried”<br />
parts were intended for monuments such as burial cists. However, not a<br />
single decorated stone has yet been recorded to be incorporated into<br />
the few burial monuments in the Gayles Moor area. Although low cairns<br />
have been reported in the vicinity, there is only one cupuled stone<br />
found near such a burial, the Stoneman Cairn. Also, there are some<br />
loose decorated stones in the area, but none <strong>of</strong> these is a suitable<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idate for the removed slab at Gayles Moor B3.<br />
* 2.2.1.1.2 NORTH PLANTATION *<br />
Further north, in Northumberl<strong>and</strong>, is a flat topped hill, called<br />
Weetwood, on which several clusters <strong>of</strong> mostly complex rock art are<br />
found on s<strong>and</strong>stone outcrops bordering <strong>and</strong> overlooking two small lakes<br />
on top <strong>of</strong> the hill <strong>and</strong> a small stream flowing east from them.<br />
Consequently two linear arrangements <strong>of</strong> rock art sites developed. One<br />
runs across Weetwood Moor Ridge towards Fowberry. <strong>The</strong> other runs<br />
from Whitsunbank Hill via North Plantation to Fowberry. Each group<br />
features a cairn that contained a large number <strong>of</strong> loose decorated<br />
rocks, but no burial. Cairn B was placed upon a heavily decorated<br />
outcrop area at the end <strong>of</strong> the North Plantation. Another decorated<br />
s<strong>and</strong>stone outcrop (marked SITE in Fig. 140) in the same Plantation<br />
features a panel which is engraved with much weathered motifs. What<br />
remained unnoticed for a long time, because <strong>of</strong> the covering earth <strong>and</strong><br />
leaves, was that a corner <strong>of</strong> the outcrop features a rectangular<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 174<br />
GEOGRAPHY