22.01.2013 Views

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

site proves to be located (on purpose ?) in a shallow depression with<br />

rather limited views, whereas other outcrops on this hill would have<br />

yielded far better <strong>van</strong>tage points. For that reason I claim that<br />

intervisibility was no longer a major goal <strong>of</strong> the siting <strong>of</strong> rock art when<br />

this complex set was executed.<br />

* 1.2.1.2.4.3 A simple cupmarked rock indicates the line from<br />

Cairnbaan to Dunamuck. Although Bradley indicates Dunamuck as simple<br />

(1997: 122), there proved to exist a complex site after all (Fig. 4;<br />

inset B). This confusion may be due to the reporting <strong>of</strong> a simple site in<br />

this area in 1985 (RCHAM.S 1988), whereas the complex site was<br />

discovered only in 1993 (Van <strong>Hoek</strong> 1994) when I checked the routetheory<br />

in the field. Bradley aligns Dunamuck onto Cairnbaan, but<br />

because <strong>of</strong> high rocky knolls north <strong>and</strong> SW <strong>of</strong> Dunamuck 2, there is no<br />

visibility <strong>of</strong> Cairnbaan from the complex site at all, nor are sites 4, 5,<br />

6 <strong>and</strong> 7 on an exactly straight line as suggested in his sketch (Fig. 4;<br />

inset A).<br />

At first sight it seems as if Dunamuck represents a case where<br />

intervisibility has been based on a complex site. It is interesting to<br />

note, however, that Dunamuck 2 represents a good example <strong>of</strong><br />

respecting previously carved simple glyphs. <strong>The</strong> smooth outcrop<br />

features ten single r<strong>and</strong>om cupules <strong>and</strong>, at the centre <strong>of</strong> the group, a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> more complex glyphs (Fig. 4, inset B). <strong>The</strong> outer rings <strong>of</strong><br />

glyphs A <strong>and</strong> B are more crudely pocked out in broad b<strong>and</strong>s respecting<br />

glyphs C <strong>and</strong> D <strong>and</strong> differing quite a bit from the inner rings that are<br />

more carefully engraved. Glyph E, the only complex glyph (!),<br />

represents a cup-<strong>and</strong>-one-ring surrounded by a hybrid spiral, possibly<br />

added later as well. Again there is ample space on this outcrop, <strong>and</strong> on<br />

many other smooth but undecorated outcrops nearby, but still one<br />

preferred to execute grooves around existing figures. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />

highly probable that when this site was chosen for its alignment on<br />

Kilmichael Glassary, it started <strong>of</strong>f as a simple site. This seems to be<br />

paralleled at Eurach (Fig. 13.A) where the apparent addition <strong>of</strong> only<br />

one set <strong>of</strong> three superficial concentric rings to one <strong>of</strong> the sixty<br />

cupules on this outcrop knoll, made it a complex site.<br />

* 1.2.1.2.4.4 <strong>The</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> establishing intervisibility by<br />

selecting special rocks is repeated at Kilmichael Glassary. Here, three<br />

or four decorated rocks are situated on a terrace at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 35<br />

m <strong>and</strong> below <strong>and</strong> SE <strong>of</strong> a cliff <strong>of</strong> 40 m high. From the main site huge<br />

outcrops extend roughly 180 m to the SW, where they reach an altitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20 m, but on the suitable visible parts no carvings are found. It<br />

again is striking that only from the main petroglyphic site, which<br />

comprises simple petroglyphs, including some remarkable keyhole<br />

designs (Fig. 103), there is a fine view up <strong>and</strong> down the route, whereas<br />

from the undecorated outcrops to the SW it is impossible to see the<br />

sites at Torbhlaran (one decorated outcrop is just visible behind the<br />

M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 28<br />

GEOGRAPHY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!