Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> best way to achieve <strong>and</strong> maintain this consensus is to travel the<br />
whole area intensively <strong>and</strong> as it becomes more <strong>and</strong> more accepted that<br />
prehistoric peoples were able to cross the open oceans even tens <strong>of</strong><br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s years ago (Bednarik 1996), it must also be accepted that<br />
there would have been no problem for Neolithic seafarers to migrate<br />
between the British Isles, Galicia <strong>and</strong> Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia <strong>and</strong> vice versa.<br />
Having accepted this view, it still remains remarkable that the art is<br />
found so heavily concentrated in only three areas. It proves that in<br />
Europe especially the areas with much indented coastlines are by far<br />
the most favourite places for the execution <strong>of</strong> cupules <strong>and</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>rings.<br />
Especially the southern rias <strong>of</strong> Galicia are marked by numerous<br />
rock art concentrations; but why is cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art lacking on its<br />
northern shores ? We also noticed many important cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
concentrations in <strong>and</strong> near the estuaries <strong>of</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong>; but<br />
why is there no rock art at several most suitable places in north-west<br />
Scotl<strong>and</strong> ? Finally we noticed the more modest cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring groups in<br />
the fjords <strong>of</strong> Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia; but again, why no cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art for<br />
instance around the Oslo fjord ?<br />
<strong>The</strong> questions may be answered as follows. If the culture <strong>of</strong> peoples <strong>of</strong><br />
the New Stone Age was indeed strongly stone-related, it is possible<br />
that areas lacking stone surfaces were avoided on purpose, because in<br />
those areas it was not possible to perform their specific culturerelated<br />
rituals necessary to propitiate the spirit world or to socialise<br />
the new l<strong>and</strong>. “Newly arrived colonists would notably have as a priority<br />
the need to make a new <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar l<strong>and</strong> familiar by constructing<br />
oral accounts <strong>of</strong> their arrival <strong>and</strong> journeys as well as by populating the<br />
new l<strong>and</strong> with spiritual beings, events, places <strong>and</strong> visual cultural marks”<br />
(Ouzman et al 1997: 6; emphasis mine). Rock art is one <strong>of</strong> the easiest<br />
<strong>and</strong> quickest ways to create such visual <strong>and</strong> enduring cultural marks.<br />
Yet, there are many areas (in the same region as the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
concentrations, on <strong>and</strong> near the suggested migratory routes, as well as<br />
<strong>and</strong> elsewhere) with suitable rock surfaces that clearly have been<br />
ignored. Often Neolithic remains are found in these areas, but no rock<br />
art tradition developed. We have noticed this in the Dolomites area <strong>of</strong><br />
the Alps, but also in many areas in Irel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Britain.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, the siting <strong>of</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art especially at these coastal<br />
areas may confirm the concept <strong>of</strong> overseas travelling, exploration <strong>and</strong><br />
interaction in accordance with their culture, but simultaneously implies<br />
that (<strong>of</strong>ten unknown) decision-making processes were at work. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
processes will greatly have been determined by the general cultural<br />
contents <strong>of</strong> the group. But also the personal conceptions <strong>and</strong> liking <strong>of</strong><br />
the individual traveller, as well as the (personal) decisions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
leader(s) <strong>of</strong> the group will have been important. Even the factor <strong>of</strong><br />
chance cannot be ruled out completely. Added to this largely<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 225<br />
GEOGRAPHY