Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
st<strong>and</strong>ing stone in Fig. 6) <strong>and</strong> for that reason they may have been<br />
untouched. From the complex site at Kilmichael Glassary, bearing cups<br />
with up to five rings, only the next site, Torbhlaran, is visible some<br />
1100 m to the NE. This confirms the conclusion found at Cairnbaan: if<br />
intervisibility exists, it more <strong>of</strong>ten involves simple sites. Also, when<br />
travelling towards the Kilmartin valley from Torbhlaran, the<br />
petroglyphs become simpler <strong>and</strong> none overlooks the Kilmartin valley.<br />
Moreover, there is no question <strong>of</strong> increasing complexity when travelling<br />
from Cairnbaan (or even from Blairbuie) via Dunamuck <strong>and</strong> Dunadd<br />
towards the megaliths at Ballymeanoch (Fig. 4; M).<br />
* 1.2.1.2.5 IGNORING KNOLLS<br />
At Dunamuck it proves again (compare Achnabreck) that prominent<br />
outcrop knolls were not necessarily preferred for engraving. Just 80 m<br />
north <strong>of</strong> site 2 is a 55 m high outcrop knoll without any carving,<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering suitable rock surfaces <strong>and</strong> excellent views. Contrary to what<br />
Bradley suggests, there is no view <strong>of</strong> the Kilmartin valley from any <strong>of</strong><br />
the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring sites on this route, although it would not at all have<br />
been a difficulty to find such a spot, especially on the northern edge<br />
<strong>of</strong> the hill which is, however, completely bereft <strong>of</strong> rock art. Instead,<br />
the view from Dunamuck 2 again focuses (also because <strong>of</strong> those two<br />
knolls) solely on Kilmichael Glassary which is clearly visible in the<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> the river Add between two darker hills that st<strong>and</strong> out against<br />
the horizon. Nearby st<strong>and</strong>ing stones, which seem to indicate the (later<br />
!) route to the megalithic monuments <strong>of</strong> the Kilmartin valley, are not<br />
visible from Dunamuck 2.<br />
* 1.2.1.2.5.1 <strong>The</strong> tendency not to mark the most conspicuous<br />
outcrop knolls, as we have seen at Achnabreck <strong>and</strong> Dunamuck (but see<br />
also Bradley 1997: 133), is repeated at Dunadd, although Bradley<br />
suggests that the significance <strong>of</strong> Dunadd “was so well established that<br />
there was little need to emphasise its importance by adding carved<br />
designs” (1997: 133). This idea, however, is contradicted by Iron Age<br />
petroglyphs on top <strong>of</strong> Dunadd, which clearly function to emphasise the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> the place when it became the capital <strong>of</strong> Dalriada. In my<br />
opinion, Dunadd was <strong>of</strong> little (or no) significance in early Neolithic<br />
times, because it was not located on the (east) route to Loch Awe <strong>and</strong><br />
because it was hard to reach in the isolation <strong>of</strong> the swamps. In late<br />
Neolithic times, when it became part <strong>of</strong> the route from Cairnbaan to<br />
Ballymeanoch, indicated by rows <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ing stones from Achnabreck up<br />
to Dunadd, it may have served as an important crossing place.<br />
Indeed, the sole engraving <strong>of</strong> a faint cup-<strong>and</strong>-one-ring at Dunadd is<br />
found on the east slope <strong>of</strong> the hillock (Morris 1977: 75), overlooking<br />
the spot where traces <strong>of</strong> an ancient causeway through the marshes<br />
have been found (Campbell 1984: 15). At this spot there is also a ford<br />
in the river Add (causeway <strong>and</strong> ford indicated with FORD in Fig. 4).<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 29<br />
GEOGRAPHY