Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
G stops at motif D. This proves that the outer rings are later than<br />
motif D. At a later stage the radial grooves T1 <strong>and</strong> T2 were added,<br />
both protruding beyond the outer ring. Notice that radial groove T1<br />
avoids the larger ring-system which proves that T1 is later than the<br />
big ring F, which fits into my theory that radial grooves represent the<br />
last main feature in the Neolithic cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring tradition <strong>of</strong> Europe (Van<br />
<strong>Hoek</strong> 1999). Later still, two more radial grooves, T3 <strong>and</strong> T4, were<br />
added <strong>and</strong> it is striking that these are fainter <strong>and</strong> do not continue<br />
outside the outer ring.<br />
Perhaps by the end <strong>of</strong> the Neolithic (or possibly in the early Bronze<br />
Age), three zoomorphic figures, H1, H2 <strong>and</strong> H3, <strong>and</strong> a half-circle, R,<br />
were added, all touching the older motif. It is most remarkable that<br />
the stag has its antler connected to the earlier cup-<strong>and</strong>-three-rings,<br />
using its radial groove. This may have been an expression <strong>of</strong> the belief<br />
that the branches <strong>of</strong> the antlers symbolised the rays <strong>of</strong> the sun <strong>and</strong><br />
that the stag, or some other animal, carried the sun across the skies<br />
(Evers 1995: 58). This “liaison” may be regarded as a fine instance <strong>of</strong><br />
“re-sanctification”.<br />
To summarise, every addition <strong>of</strong> a cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring symbol onto existing<br />
cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring sites actually may represent an instance <strong>of</strong> “resanctification”,<br />
as every addition is an expression <strong>of</strong> the same cultural<br />
tradition. To distinguish between this “normal” practice within the cup<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
tradition <strong>and</strong> the suggested special meaning behind the term<br />
“re-sanctification”, I rather would like to define “re-sanctification” as<br />
the premeditated petroglyphic alteration <strong>of</strong> an existing (cup-<strong>and</strong>ring)<br />
motif by a completely different culture, so that it merges in<br />
the symbolism <strong>of</strong> that new culture. In this way the term “resanctification”<br />
creates a distinct chronological <strong>and</strong> cultural gap<br />
between the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring tradition <strong>and</strong> subsequent rock art traditions<br />
that developed in the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring regions <strong>of</strong> Europe.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> typical “liaisons” between cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art <strong>and</strong> other art<br />
forms emerged, such as the “disc-men” <strong>of</strong> Bohuslän in Sweden <strong>and</strong> the<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> animals with cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings in Galicia. But first the<br />
possible relation between the quarrying <strong>of</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art <strong>and</strong> the<br />
subsequent “re-sanctification” <strong>of</strong> that quarried site will be discussed<br />
in Chapter 2.2.1.<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 169 GEOGRAPHY