Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
dates to the end <strong>of</strong> the Mesolithic <strong>and</strong> is regarded to be the earliest<br />
megalithic structure <strong>of</strong> the Atlantic seaboard at the moment.<br />
Consequently, the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring motif <strong>of</strong> Neolithic Europe may be much<br />
older than generally accepted.<br />
Another argument for an introduction <strong>of</strong> the ringmark later than the<br />
cupule, is provided by the many instances where ringmarks clearly have<br />
been added to existing cupules or even to natural holes (Van <strong>Hoek</strong><br />
1997c). Although it is highly probable that indeed natural rock<br />
features initially inspired prehistoric people, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
natural depression could never have replaced the ritual <strong>of</strong> making the<br />
mark <strong>and</strong> when people started to execute cupules during their<br />
ceremonies, not only the resulting cupule will have been important, but<br />
also the ritual act <strong>of</strong> making the symbol.<br />
<strong>The</strong> salient point now is that, when the ringing tradition was<br />
introduced, also natural depressions were accepted as substitutes for<br />
cupules. <strong>The</strong> making <strong>of</strong> a cupule then no longer was a necessary part <strong>of</strong><br />
the ritual, but it remained an essential part <strong>of</strong> the symbol, although<br />
later it diminished in size because <strong>of</strong> its declining importance. <strong>The</strong><br />
ringing tradition was clearly superimposed upon existing cupules. <strong>The</strong>n,<br />
as time went by, the number <strong>of</strong> rings around a cupule increased <strong>and</strong><br />
ultimately impressive<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> multiple rings<br />
evolved (Fig. 120).<br />
It is most likely that<br />
these large sets <strong>of</strong><br />
multiple cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings<br />
are later features.<br />
Notably their complex<br />
nature, with emphasis on<br />
the ringmarks <strong>and</strong> the<br />
decline <strong>of</strong> the central<br />
cupule (most evident in<br />
FIG. 120: GARGAMALA 4, GALICIA.<br />
Fig. 120), is an argument<br />
in favour <strong>of</strong> a later date <strong>of</strong> such multiple ring systems. It is rather<br />
apocryphal to state that these complex motifs originated at the very<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the ringing tradition; they must be later. Also their<br />
impressive appearance <strong>and</strong> the fact that multiple concentric rings with<br />
or without central cupule appear frequently in the art <strong>of</strong> the Irish<br />
passage tombs, seems to indicate contemporaneity with the passage<br />
tomb period. By this time, (concentric) ringmarks without a central<br />
cupule also appear on the rocks (Fig. 127), especially in Galicia, but<br />
also in Norway (for instance at Vinje 1, Fig. 115; <strong>and</strong> Fitja, Fig. 106).<br />
During this period, people lavished considerable time <strong>and</strong> energy on the<br />
execution <strong>of</strong> spectacular sites <strong>and</strong> petroglyphs at specific places, due<br />
to a late but short-lived florescence which probably caused a strong<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 154 GEOGRAPHY