22.01.2013 Views

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dates to the end <strong>of</strong> the Mesolithic <strong>and</strong> is regarded to be the earliest<br />

megalithic structure <strong>of</strong> the Atlantic seaboard at the moment.<br />

Consequently, the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring motif <strong>of</strong> Neolithic Europe may be much<br />

older than generally accepted.<br />

Another argument for an introduction <strong>of</strong> the ringmark later than the<br />

cupule, is provided by the many instances where ringmarks clearly have<br />

been added to existing cupules or even to natural holes (Van <strong>Hoek</strong><br />

1997c). Although it is highly probable that indeed natural rock<br />

features initially inspired prehistoric people, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

natural depression could never have replaced the ritual <strong>of</strong> making the<br />

mark <strong>and</strong> when people started to execute cupules during their<br />

ceremonies, not only the resulting cupule will have been important, but<br />

also the ritual act <strong>of</strong> making the symbol.<br />

<strong>The</strong> salient point now is that, when the ringing tradition was<br />

introduced, also natural depressions were accepted as substitutes for<br />

cupules. <strong>The</strong> making <strong>of</strong> a cupule then no longer was a necessary part <strong>of</strong><br />

the ritual, but it remained an essential part <strong>of</strong> the symbol, although<br />

later it diminished in size because <strong>of</strong> its declining importance. <strong>The</strong><br />

ringing tradition was clearly superimposed upon existing cupules. <strong>The</strong>n,<br />

as time went by, the number <strong>of</strong> rings around a cupule increased <strong>and</strong><br />

ultimately impressive<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> multiple rings<br />

evolved (Fig. 120).<br />

It is most likely that<br />

these large sets <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings<br />

are later features.<br />

Notably their complex<br />

nature, with emphasis on<br />

the ringmarks <strong>and</strong> the<br />

decline <strong>of</strong> the central<br />

cupule (most evident in<br />

FIG. 120: GARGAMALA 4, GALICIA.<br />

Fig. 120), is an argument<br />

in favour <strong>of</strong> a later date <strong>of</strong> such multiple ring systems. It is rather<br />

apocryphal to state that these complex motifs originated at the very<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the ringing tradition; they must be later. Also their<br />

impressive appearance <strong>and</strong> the fact that multiple concentric rings with<br />

or without central cupule appear frequently in the art <strong>of</strong> the Irish<br />

passage tombs, seems to indicate contemporaneity with the passage<br />

tomb period. By this time, (concentric) ringmarks without a central<br />

cupule also appear on the rocks (Fig. 127), especially in Galicia, but<br />

also in Norway (for instance at Vinje 1, Fig. 115; <strong>and</strong> Fitja, Fig. 106).<br />

During this period, people lavished considerable time <strong>and</strong> energy on the<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> spectacular sites <strong>and</strong> petroglyphs at specific places, due<br />

to a late but short-lived florescence which probably caused a strong<br />

M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 154 GEOGRAPHY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!