Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
� CHAPTER 2.2 �<br />
INSTANCES OF “RE-SANCTIFICATION”<br />
OF EUROPEAN CUP-AND-RINGS<br />
� INTRODUCTION �<br />
<strong>The</strong> first time I came across the term “re-sanctification” in relation<br />
with Neolithic cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art, was in a book by Beckensall & Laurie<br />
(1998). In this comprehensive work on rock art in the north <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong><br />
the authors stated that they discovered an instance <strong>of</strong> prehistoric<br />
quarrying <strong>of</strong> a cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring site, followed by renewed execution <strong>of</strong> cup<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
engraving. This practice was labelled “re-sanctification” by<br />
them. Instances <strong>of</strong> “re-sanctification” will be the subject <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following four chapters <strong>and</strong> Chapter 2.2.1 will especially deal with the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> quarrying.<br />
<strong>The</strong>ir use <strong>of</strong> the term “re-sanctification” within the quarrying context<br />
was rather obscure, however. From their description it seemed as if<br />
“re-sanctification” was something special; an exception. But it must not<br />
be forgotten that it has been a<br />
normal practice to add new cup-<strong>and</strong>rings<br />
to existing sites over very<br />
long periods <strong>of</strong> time. It is even<br />
possible that the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring<br />
tradition <strong>of</strong> a certain area stopped<br />
for a while <strong>and</strong> that later the<br />
practice revived again; for instance<br />
when large sets <strong>of</strong> multiple ring<br />
systems were introduced (Chapter<br />
FIG. 133 A: WEETWOOD 9<br />
AND B: CHATTON 1.<br />
2.1). This may have led to the<br />
replenishment <strong>of</strong> existing cup-<strong>and</strong>rings.<br />
Although scientific pro<strong>of</strong> is<br />
lacking, there are quite a few instances where it is feasible that new<br />
ringmarks were added to existing cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings. Further on I will<br />
discuss a fine example at Lombo da Costa, Galicia. But there are other<br />
indications <strong>of</strong> “re-sanctification”.<br />
Occasionally instances <strong>of</strong> superimposition <strong>and</strong> incorporation also occur<br />
<strong>and</strong> it may be significant that mainly the group <strong>of</strong> simpler cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings<br />
became incorporated or superimposed. Notice for example that the<br />
third inner ring at Weetwood 9 is flattened to avoid the existing cup<strong>and</strong>-two-rings<br />
nearby, while the outer ring is interrupted by the cup<strong>and</strong>-two<br />
rings (Fig. 133.A); <strong>and</strong> at Chatton 1 a cup-<strong>and</strong>-one-ring is<br />
incorporated into a large multiple ring system (Fig. 133.B). Similar<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 167 GEOGRAPHY