Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
top <strong>of</strong> a protruding rock shelter. In general one can state that the<br />
circular engravings <strong>of</strong> the Neolithic are completely lacking on vertical<br />
outcrop faces in Northumberl<strong>and</strong>. This strongly contrasts with the fine<br />
site at Ballochmyle in western Scotl<strong>and</strong>, where hundreds <strong>of</strong> cups <strong>and</strong><br />
cup-<strong>and</strong>-rings appear on a huge vertical s<strong>and</strong>stone cliff !<br />
Northumberl<strong>and</strong>’s s<strong>and</strong>stone ridges occasionally feature outcrop<br />
stacks, <strong>of</strong>ten in weird shapes, possibly once detached from the main<br />
scarp slope. Also these impressive rock formations have been avoided<br />
by the petroglyph manufacturers, although at one site, Caller Crag, I<br />
discovered a large number <strong>of</strong> small cupules (facing the hill slope) on a<br />
the vertical part <strong>of</strong> a large outcrop stack (Van <strong>Hoek</strong> 1989: 15).<br />
* 1.2.3.1.2 It is on the gentle dip slope that the great majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> the petroglyphs has been executed. As only a thin layer <strong>of</strong> earth or<br />
turf covers the bedrock, it is easily exposed, especially on the highest<br />
ground. Also on these dip slopes are several minor ridges <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stone,<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering suitable surfaces for engraving.<br />
But also in Northumberl<strong>and</strong> differential selecting processes, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
hard to underst<strong>and</strong>, were at work. Why where some outcrops selected<br />
<strong>and</strong> others nearby, equally suitable, neglected ? Several explanations<br />
have been put forward, relating distribution patterns to (contemporary<br />
?) monuments in the area (Beckensall 1983; Bradley 1997), to long<br />
distance migration (Van <strong>Hoek</strong> 1982; Bradley 1997) <strong>and</strong> to short distance<br />
mobility (Bradley 1997). Again the true story is complex <strong>and</strong> much is<br />
still obscure, but it becomes more <strong>and</strong> more accepted that the position<br />
<strong>of</strong> the petroglyphs is related to the movements <strong>of</strong> the people across<br />
the l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> to the l<strong>and</strong>scape itself. But are there rules dictating<br />
the location <strong>of</strong> the petroglyph sites ? No doubt there will have been<br />
choices that are culturally determined, but in my opinion matters <strong>of</strong><br />
chance <strong>and</strong> the personal liking <strong>of</strong> the manufacturer can definitely not<br />
be ruled out.<br />
* 1.2.3.2 DOUBTFUL AND CERTAIN LINES *<br />
Northumberl<strong>and</strong>’s geomorphology easily gives rise to the establishing<br />
<strong>of</strong> lines <strong>of</strong> visibility between rock art sites. Wide views are common in<br />
this area. But does this mean that petroglyphic sites have deliberately<br />
been selected conform lines <strong>of</strong> intervisibility ? This view seems to be<br />
held by Bradley (1997: 88) “…each major complex may be linked to only<br />
one or two other locations with rock carvings, forming a network <strong>of</strong><br />
connections along the major valley system, which extends from southeast<br />
to north-west. <strong>The</strong> rocks themselves cannot be picked out over<br />
such long distances, but it is certainly possible to identify the natural<br />
locations where they are found”.<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 43 GEOGRAPHY