22.01.2013 Views

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

� CHAPTER 2.1 �<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF COMPLEX ART<br />

� INTRODUCTION �<br />

<strong>The</strong> most simple petroglyph, the cupule, is also the most intriguing<br />

symbol. It may have had several meanings <strong>and</strong> therefore its<br />

interpretation is difficult or even impossible. Also its wide distribution<br />

makes it rather intangible. It hardly is suitable as a “guide-fossil” to<br />

explain patterns <strong>of</strong> rock art distribution. For that purpose we<br />

preferably need short-lived motifs that have a limited distribution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem with cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art is that there still is no absolute<br />

dating for its elements. Is the cupule older than the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring ? Is<br />

a central cupule older than its surrounding ring ? Are complex cup-<strong>and</strong>rings<br />

younger than simple examples ? All these questions are crucial in<br />

the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art <strong>and</strong> the answers are necessary to<br />

explain the distribution patterns across Europe. Absolute dating <strong>of</strong><br />

European cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring sites <strong>and</strong> its composing elements proves to be an<br />

absolute must <strong>and</strong> is therefore strongly<br />

recommended as an important subject for<br />

future research.<br />

For the time being I will depart from the<br />

personal view that the cupule was the first<br />

element to be introduced in the cup-<strong>and</strong>ring<br />

tradition <strong>of</strong> western Europe. In my<br />

opinion this happened rather early, notably<br />

during the end <strong>of</strong> the Mesolithic or the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the Neolithic. Soon (but how<br />

“soon” ?) after that, the ringmark was<br />

introduced. In the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art <strong>of</strong><br />

Europe, cupules with single ring (Fig. 119)<br />

clearly predominate. This suggests strong<br />

historical priority for the cupule with one<br />

FIG. 119: WHITEHILL, SCOTLAND.<br />

ring. Although ringmarks are firmly associated with cupules, it is still<br />

highly probable that the ringmark as a rock art symbol was introduced<br />

later by a people different to the cupule carvers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> the ringmark possibly coincides with the arrival <strong>of</strong><br />

megalithic tombs in the Atlantic region. In this respect it is significant<br />

that in 1998 a discovery was made <strong>of</strong> a megalithic tomb near Sligo in<br />

western Irel<strong>and</strong>, which proved to be at least 700 years older than the<br />

oldest megalithic structure in western Europe. This tomb possibly<br />

M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 153 GEOGRAPHY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!