Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Maarten van Hoek The Geography of Cup-and-Ring ... - StoneWatch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
� CHAPTER 2.1 �<br />
DISTRIBUTION OF COMPLEX ART<br />
� INTRODUCTION �<br />
<strong>The</strong> most simple petroglyph, the cupule, is also the most intriguing<br />
symbol. It may have had several meanings <strong>and</strong> therefore its<br />
interpretation is difficult or even impossible. Also its wide distribution<br />
makes it rather intangible. It hardly is suitable as a “guide-fossil” to<br />
explain patterns <strong>of</strong> rock art distribution. For that purpose we<br />
preferably need short-lived motifs that have a limited distribution.<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem with cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art is that there still is no absolute<br />
dating for its elements. Is the cupule older than the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring ? Is<br />
a central cupule older than its surrounding ring ? Are complex cup-<strong>and</strong>rings<br />
younger than simple examples ? All these questions are crucial in<br />
the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art <strong>and</strong> the answers are necessary to<br />
explain the distribution patterns across Europe. Absolute dating <strong>of</strong><br />
European cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring sites <strong>and</strong> its composing elements proves to be an<br />
absolute must <strong>and</strong> is therefore strongly<br />
recommended as an important subject for<br />
future research.<br />
For the time being I will depart from the<br />
personal view that the cupule was the first<br />
element to be introduced in the cup-<strong>and</strong>ring<br />
tradition <strong>of</strong> western Europe. In my<br />
opinion this happened rather early, notably<br />
during the end <strong>of</strong> the Mesolithic or the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the Neolithic. Soon (but how<br />
“soon” ?) after that, the ringmark was<br />
introduced. In the cup-<strong>and</strong>-ring art <strong>of</strong><br />
Europe, cupules with single ring (Fig. 119)<br />
clearly predominate. This suggests strong<br />
historical priority for the cupule with one<br />
FIG. 119: WHITEHILL, SCOTLAND.<br />
ring. Although ringmarks are firmly associated with cupules, it is still<br />
highly probable that the ringmark as a rock art symbol was introduced<br />
later by a people different to the cupule carvers.<br />
<strong>The</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> the ringmark possibly coincides with the arrival <strong>of</strong><br />
megalithic tombs in the Atlantic region. In this respect it is significant<br />
that in 1998 a discovery was made <strong>of</strong> a megalithic tomb near Sligo in<br />
western Irel<strong>and</strong>, which proved to be at least 700 years older than the<br />
oldest megalithic structure in western Europe. This tomb possibly<br />
M. <strong>van</strong> HOEK: 153 GEOGRAPHY