13.07.2015 Views

Il natural desiderio di sapere - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

Il natural desiderio di sapere - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

Il natural desiderio di sapere - Pontifical Academy of Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEDERICO CESI, THE FIRST ACADEMY, AND UMBRIA 85boat had gone some eight or ten arm’s lengths ahead, with all thatthe key fell down between him and me, because besides going up ithad also acquired from the motion <strong>of</strong> the boat the other, to go alongwith its movement and follow it, as it <strong>di</strong>d. 114Beyond its extemporaneous character, Galileo’s experiment asrecounted by Stelluti takes on important historical, methodological, andscientific significance. It reveals first <strong>of</strong> all that some privileged places <strong>of</strong>the land <strong>of</strong> Umbria, like the Ducal palace itself, were the places in whichfor the first time the principle <strong>of</strong> the relativity <strong>of</strong> motion was advancedand <strong>di</strong>scussed, reveals that these were the very places that witnessed theexperimental baptism <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong> relativity, ‘the true keystone <strong>of</strong>modern physics’. 115Without exaggeration, Galileo’s two-week stay in the region <strong>of</strong>Umbria, in Acquasparta, in 1624, can be considered the crucial moment<strong>of</strong> conjunction between the experience <strong>of</strong> the Lynceans and the methodologicalhorizon <strong>of</strong> modern experimental science.And that’s not all. On his journey Galileo had in fact brought with himhis ‘eye-glass’, that is his microscope, ‘to see up close the most minimalthings’. And while on that occasion, having to carry it down to Rome,Galileo <strong>di</strong>d not leave the ‘eye-glass’ with Cesi, he <strong>di</strong>d, however, send himanother one, duly improved, in September <strong>of</strong> the same year. It was thanksto this same Galilean instrument, in fact, that the Lynceans became thefoun<strong>di</strong>ng fathers, as was mentioned earlier, <strong>of</strong> present day scientificmicroscopy. And although, as again Conti observes, ‘in nearly all the universities<strong>of</strong> the time <strong>natural</strong> philosophy had not followed the investigativeand methodological advances <strong>of</strong> “Lynceality”’, thanks to the contiguity <strong>of</strong>their interests and experiences, ‘the University, which had contributed<strong>di</strong>rectly to the cultural preparation <strong>of</strong> two prestigious Lynceans, wouldsurely have welcomed and developed the legacy left by Cesi’, if it were notthat the controversy over the stars and intolerance had made it so thatthings turned out <strong>di</strong>fferently. 116114 Francesco Stelluti to unknown, Rome 8 January 1633, in loc. cit., p. 62.115 L. Conti, Sotto il segno degli astri: lo stu<strong>di</strong>o perugino e i Lincei, in G. Sapori, C. Vinti,L. Conti, <strong>Il</strong> Palazzo Cesi <strong>di</strong> Acquasparta e la rivoluzione scientifica lincea, op. cit., p. 79.116 Ibid., p. 83.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!