21.09.2013 Views

Rapporten - SBU

Rapporten - SBU

Rapporten - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3.2.13 Social skills.<br />

Author<br />

Year<br />

Reference<br />

Country<br />

Beaumont et al<br />

2008<br />

[51]<br />

Australia<br />

Study design Population<br />

characteristics<br />

Design<br />

RCT, waitlist<br />

controls<br />

Aim<br />

To investigate<br />

the effectiveness<br />

of a multi-component<br />

social<br />

skills intervention<br />

for children with<br />

Asperger syndrome<br />

Diagnosis<br />

An Asperger<br />

syndrome diagnosis<br />

confirmed using<br />

DSM-IV-TR criteria<br />

No of participants<br />

49<br />

Gender<br />

44 boys, 5 girls<br />

Age<br />

7.5–11 years<br />

IQ<br />

>85<br />

218 Autismspektrumtillstånd – diAgnostik och insAtser,<br />

KAPITEL 3 • sysTEmATIsK LITTErATurövErsIKT – insAtser vid Ast<br />

219<br />

vårdens orgAnisAtion och pAtientens delAktighet<br />

Intervention Follow up period<br />

Drop-out rate<br />

I: The Junior Detective<br />

Training Program with<br />

four components: group<br />

training of social skills,<br />

parent training, teacher<br />

handouts, a computer<br />

game. Start with parent<br />

information, children<br />

and parents then had<br />

7 weekly sessions.<br />

follow-up session after<br />

6 weeks.<br />

n=26<br />

C: Waitlist group;<br />

then treatment as in I.<br />

n=23<br />

C = Control group; DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders,<br />

fourth edition, text revision; ERSSQ = Emotion regulation and social skills questionnaire;<br />

I = Intervention group; IQ = Intelligence quotient; p = Probability coefficient; RCT = Randomised<br />

controlled trial; SSQP = Social skills questionnaire parent version<br />

Assessments<br />

At baseline, post-<br />

treatment/postwaitlist<br />

and after follow-up for<br />

6 weeks + for both<br />

groups follow-up<br />

5 months after com-<br />

pletion of treatment<br />

Drop-outs<br />

At 5 months post-<br />

intervention:<br />

I: n=1<br />

C: n=2<br />

Main results Study quality<br />

Comments<br />

Questionnaires<br />

SSQ-P (parent form)<br />

Pretreatment:<br />

I: 25.30 (7.43)<br />

C: 23.16 (9.05)<br />

Posttreatment:<br />

I: 38.08 (9.84)<br />

C: 25.11 (7.91)<br />

ERSSQ (parent rating)<br />

Pretreatment:<br />

I: 39.78 (10.17)<br />

C: 39.64 (12.52)<br />

Posttreatment:<br />

I: 57.38 (13.40)<br />

C: 40.14 (10.69)<br />

For SSQ-P and ERSSQ:<br />

I: Improvement from pre-to<br />

post-treatment (p C (significant difference)<br />

Other<br />

Test of Emotion management strategies<br />

(the tests “James” and “Dylan”).<br />

I: Improvement from pre-to posttreatment<br />

(p C (significant difference)<br />

Improvements compared to baseline<br />

maintained 5 months after treatment<br />

(p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!