с обл мал
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
‘9 (101) декабрь 2016 г.<br />
ПРАКТИЧЕСКАЯ МЕДИЦИНА 141<br />
Таким образом, эла<strong>с</strong>тография реального времени<br />
и эла<strong>с</strong>тография <strong>с</strong>двиговой волной являют<strong>с</strong>я<br />
чув<strong>с</strong>твительным и <strong>с</strong>пецифичным диагно<strong>с</strong>тиче<strong>с</strong>ким<br />
методом, <strong>с</strong>по<strong>с</strong>обным количе<strong>с</strong>твенно оценить эла<strong>с</strong>тично<strong>с</strong>ть<br />
шейки матки на ранних <strong>с</strong>роках беременно<strong>с</strong>ти,<br />
как при нор<strong>мал</strong>ьной беременно<strong>с</strong>ти, так и при<br />
беременно<strong>с</strong>ти <strong>с</strong> вы<strong>с</strong>оким ри<strong>с</strong>ком невынашивания.<br />
Выводы<br />
При обобщении вышеизложенного <strong>с</strong>тановит<strong>с</strong>я<br />
очевидным, что ультразвуковая оценка о<strong>с</strong>обенно<strong>с</strong>тей<br />
ремоделирования шейки матки в первом триме<strong>с</strong>тре<br />
беременных методами ультразвуковой эла<strong>с</strong>тографии<br />
<strong>с</strong>по<strong>с</strong>обна <strong>с</strong> вы<strong>с</strong>окой долей вероятно<strong>с</strong>ти<br />
прогнозировать наличие ри<strong>с</strong>ка невынашивания по<br />
причине хромо<strong>с</strong>омной патологии плода у женщин<br />
группы вы<strong>с</strong>окого ри<strong>с</strong>ка. При <strong>с</strong>опо<strong>с</strong>тавлении диагно<strong>с</strong>тиче<strong>с</strong>кой<br />
информативно<strong>с</strong>ти ультразвуковой эла<strong>с</strong>тографии<br />
реального времени и ультразвуковой<br />
эла<strong>с</strong>тографии <strong>с</strong>двиговой волной было выявлено,<br />
что оба те<strong>с</strong>та <strong>обл</strong>адают вы<strong>с</strong>окой <strong>с</strong>пецифично<strong>с</strong>тью и<br />
NPV, однако, ультразвуковая эла<strong>с</strong>тография реального<br />
времени у<strong>с</strong>тупает в плане PPV.<br />
ЛИТЕРАТУРА<br />
1. Tsoi E., Akmal S., Rane S. et al. Ultrasound assessment of<br />
cervical length in threatened preterm labor // Ultrasound. Obstet.<br />
Gynecol. ― 2003. ― Vol. 21. ― P. 552-555.<br />
2. Choi T.Y., Lee H.M., Park W.Y. et al. Spontaneous abortion<br />
and recurrent miscarriage: A comparison of cytogenetic diagnosis<br />
in 250 cases // Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. ― 2014. ― Vol. 57, №6. ―<br />
P. 518-525.<br />
3. Souka A.P., Papastefanou I., Michalitsi V. A predictive model<br />
of short cervix at 20-24 weeks using first-trimester cervical length<br />
measurement and maternal history // Prenat. Diagn. ― 2011. ―<br />
Vol. 31. ― P. 202-206.<br />
4. Tobechukwu M.T. , Ose-Emenim I.B., Ehinwenma O. Sonographic<br />
evaluation of uterine cervical dimension within 4-24 weeks of<br />
pregnancy // Nigerian J. of Clinical Practice. ― 2011. ― Vol. 4 (14). ―<br />
P. 400-404.<br />
5. Slager J., Lynne S. Assessment of cervical length and the<br />
relationship between short cervix and preterm birth // J. Midwifery.<br />
Womens. Health. ― 2012. ― Suppl. 1. ― Vol. 57. ― P. 4-11.<br />
6. Word R.A., Li X.H., Hnat M., Carrick K. Dynamics of cervical<br />
remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and<br />
current concepts // Sem. Reprod. Med. ― 2007. ― Vol. 1 (25). ―<br />
P. 69-79.<br />
7. Danforth D. The morphology of the human cervix // Clin. Obstet.<br />
Gynecol. ― 1983. ― Vol. 1 (26). ― Р. 7-13.<br />
8. Harkness M.L., Harkness R.D. Changes in the physical properties<br />
of the uterine cervix of the rat during pregnancy // J. of Physiology. ―<br />
1959. ― Vol. 148. ― Р. 527-547.<br />
9. Read C.P., Word R.A., Ruscheinsky M.A. et al. Cervical remodeling<br />
during pregnancy and parturition: molecular characterization of the<br />
softening phase in mice // Reproduction. ― 2007. ― Vol. 134. ―<br />
Р. 327-340.<br />
10. Ophir J., Cespedes I., Ponnekanti H. et al. Elastography:<br />
a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues //<br />
Ultrason. Imag. ― 1991. ― Vol. 13. ― Р. 111-134.<br />
11. Degani Sh., Leibovitz Z., Shapiro I. et al. Myometrial Thickness<br />
in Pregnancy: Longitudinal Sonographic Study // J. Ultrasound. Med. ―<br />
1998. ― Vol. 17. ― Р. 661-665.<br />
12. Mazza E., Parra-Saavedra M., Bajka M. et al. In vivo assessment<br />
of the biochemical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy //<br />
Prenatal Diagnosis. ― 2014. ― 34. ― P. 33-41.<br />
13. Myers K., Ateshian G.A. Interstitial Growth and Remodeling of<br />
Biological Tissues: Tissue Composition as State Variables // J. Mech.<br />
Behav. Biomed. Mater. ― 2014. ― Vol. 29. ― P. 544-556.<br />
14. Vargis E., Brown N., Williams K. et al. Detecting biochemical<br />
changes in he rodent cervix during pregnancy using Raman<br />
spectroscopy // Ann. Biomed. Eng. ― 2012. ― Vol. 40. ― P. 1814-<br />
1824.<br />
15. Myers K., Socrate S., Tzeranis D., House M. Changes in the<br />
biochemical constituents and morphologic appearance of the human<br />
cervical stroma during pregnancy // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod.<br />
Biol. ― 2009. ― Vol. 144 (Suppl 1). ― Р. S82-S89.<br />
16. Winkler M., Rath W. Changes in the cervical extracellular<br />
matrix during pregnancy and parturition // J. Perinat. Med. ― 1999. ―<br />
Vol. 27. ― P. 45-61.<br />
17. Timmons B., Akins M., Mahendroo M. Cervical remodeling<br />
during pregnancy and parturition // Trends. Endocrin Metabolism. ―<br />
2010. ― Vol. 6 (21). ― P. 353-361.<br />
18. Parra-Saavedra M., Gomez L., Barrero A., et al. Prediction<br />
of preterm birth using the cervical consistency index // Ultrasound<br />
Obstet. Gynecol. ― 2011. ― Vol. 38. ― P. 44-51.<br />
19. O’Connell M.P., Avis N.J., Brown B.H. et al. Electrical impedance<br />
measurements: an objective measure of prelabor cervical change //<br />
J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. ― 2003. ― Vol. 14 (6). ― P. 389-391.<br />
20. Maul H., Mackay L., Garfield R. Cervical ripening: biochemical,<br />
molecular, and clinical considerations // Clin. Obstet&Gynecol. ―<br />
2006. ― Vol. 49. ― P. 70-76.<br />
21. Thomas A. Imaging of the cervix using sonoelastography //<br />
Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol. ― 2006. ― Vol. 28. ― P. 356-357.<br />
22. Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Elastography of the uterine<br />
cervix: implications for success of induction of labor // Ultrasound.<br />
Obstet. Gynecol. ― 2011. ― Т. 38. ― P. 52-56.<br />
23. Yamaguchi S., Kamei Y., Kozuma S. et al. Tissue elastography<br />
imaging of the uterine cervix during pregnancy // J. Med. Ultrasonics. ―<br />
2007. ― Vol. 39. ― P. 209-210.<br />
24. Khalil M.R., Thorsen P., Uldbjerg N. Cervical ultrasound<br />
elastography may hold potential to predict risk of preterm birth //<br />
Dan. Med. J. ― 2013. ― Vol. 60. ― Р. A4570.<br />
25. Molina F.S., Gómez L.F., Florido J. et al. Quantification of<br />
cervical elastography: a reproducibility study // Ultrasound. Obstet.<br />
Gynecol. ― 2012. ― Vol. 39. ― Р. 685-689.<br />
26. Fruscalzo A., Schmitz R., Klockenbusch W., Steinhard<br />
J. Reliability of cervix elastography in the late first and second<br />
trimester of pregnancy // Ultraschall Med. ― 2012. ― Vol. 7 (33). ―<br />
Р. E101-E107.<br />
27. Sananes N., Langer B., Gaudineau A. et al. Prediction of<br />
spontaneous preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies: where are we<br />
and where are we going? A review of literature // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. ―<br />
2014. ― Vol. 6 (34). ― P. 457-461.<br />
28. Sabiani L., Haumonte J.B., Loundou A. et al. Cervical HI-RTE<br />
elastography and pregnancy outcome: a prospective study // Eur. J.<br />
Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod Biol. ― 2015. ― Vol. 186. ― P. 80-84.<br />
Современные пр<strong>обл</strong>емы диагно<strong>с</strong>тики в медицине
Change language