02.04.2013 Views

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are linked to those <strong>art</strong>istic characteristics which are interpreted by <strong>art</strong> therapists. Many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studies reviewed here developed their own tests for the study using <strong>art</strong>istic<br />

characteristics which were said to be equivalent to the behaviourial symptomatic<br />

characteristics used for diagnosis. <strong>The</strong> only criterion used in many cases was how the<br />

experimenters thought the visual sequelae <strong>of</strong> thought disorder should look, supported by<br />

previous examples <strong>of</strong> the same process. This is not enough. It is unsound to conclude<br />

that paintings are or are not diagnostically valid if there is no evidence that the test items<br />

are a) reliable themselves or b) measure any symptomatic behaviour and c) relate to visual<br />

output. <strong>The</strong> DDS team 168 have argued that they cannot produce a validity index since<br />

there is yet no comparable instrument with the DDS, but there are many other<br />

established tests measuring diagnostic and other qualities which could provide non-visual<br />

indices for DDS correlations, and which so far have not been used. Indeed, the DDS itself<br />

has not even produced good correlations with its only criterion, diagnosis itself 169 ,<br />

although it has produced a reliable format. Adapted tests too, must provide a criterion<br />

measure, so that it is certain that aspects which have been deleted are not integral to the<br />

validity <strong>of</strong> the test. <strong>The</strong> first validity question therefore must be: are these assessment<br />

measures really measuring what they are designed to measure?<br />

Even where obvious and relatively consistent phenomena are reported, what is<br />

measured may be a confounding variable, something which accompanies the symptom,<br />

168 Mills et. al. (1993) Reliability and validity tests <strong>of</strong> the Diagnostic Drawing Series,<br />

Psychotherapy , V.20:83-88.<br />

106<br />

Arts in<br />

169<br />

See my critique later in Chapter 2, reliability analysis. DDS produced by B. Cohen, J. Hammer and<br />

S. Singer (1988) <strong>The</strong> Diagnostic Drawing Series: a systematic approach to <strong>art</strong> therapy evaluation and<br />

research, Arts in Ps ychotherapy , V.15(1): 11-21. Although to be fair, the DDS is head and shoulders<br />

above the competition, and further research on the statistics would produce a more suitable analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!