The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

Table 1. Frequency and percentage of criterion variables for 70 studies by result
Variables
No. criterion
measures
0
1
2
3
4
15
Comparison
cognitive
emotion
development
diagnosis
Criterion form
diagnosis
self report/picture
mix of content/form
behaviourial/IQ
verbal
Art-test form
KFD
DAP
Formal other
copy
other theme
free
all cases Result 1:
associatio
n
n=70
freq %
33 47.1
13 18.6
12 17.1
9 12.9
2 2.9
1 1.4
11 15.7
12 17.1
9 12.9
37 52.9
33 47.1
6 8.6
1 1.4
27 38.6
3 4.3
6 8.6
24 34.3
3 4.3
5 7.1
16 22.9
16 22.9
n=42
freq %
26 61.9
6 14.3
4 9.5
3 7.1
2 4.8
1 2.4
5 11.9
8 19.1
2 4.8
27 64.3
26 61.9
2 4.8
1 2.4
12 28.6
1 2.4
3 7.1
11 26.2
1 2.4
4 9.5
12 28.6
11 26.2
109
Result 2:no
association
n=28
freq %
Result 1: significant association of measure with criterion test.
Result 2: no association of measure with criterion test
7 25
7 25
8 28.6
6 21.4
0
0
6 21.4
5 17.9
4 25
5 35.7
7 25
4 14.3
0
15 53.6
2 7.1
3 10.7
13 46.4
2 7.1
1 3.6
4 14.3
5 17.9
Most of the criterion tests used measured diagnosis or IQ. Diagnostic criteria were
compared with a mix of art tests (DAP 24%, free 30%, other theme 36%); thematic were
more popular and they were always compared on diagnosis. Achievement tests were
popularly compared with the Draw-a-person protocol (44%) but were compared equally
on cognition (30%) and development (30%), and a smaller percentage but equal
distribution of emotional (18.5%) and diagnostic functions (18.5%).