02.04.2013 Views

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

The psychopathology of everyday art: a quantitative Study - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 7: Frequency and percentage <strong>of</strong> test variables for whole sample by Results 159 .<br />

Variables n=51<br />

freq %<br />

Test design<br />

pre & post int'n<br />

post intervention<br />

comparison only<br />

retrospective<br />

No. measures<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

15<br />

Derivation <strong>of</strong> test<br />

developed this study<br />

adapted<br />

observation/clinical<br />

established<br />

Orientation<br />

comparison only<br />

expressive<br />

therapy - self esteem<br />

Measurement method<br />

formal comparison <strong>art</strong><br />

meaning/content<br />

mixed comparison<br />

non<strong>art</strong>/behaviour<br />

Measurement form<br />

objective detail<br />

content subject/theme<br />

mix objective/content<br />

other behaviour<br />

verbal<br />

All studies Result 1<br />

Difference<br />

patients/<br />

nonpatients<br />

6 12<br />

3 6<br />

36 71<br />

6 12<br />

31 61<br />

9 18<br />

8 16<br />

2 4<br />

1 2<br />

23 45<br />

8 16<br />

4 8<br />

16 31<br />

43 84<br />

3 6<br />

5 10<br />

19 37<br />

4 8<br />

21 41<br />

7 13<br />

18 35<br />

11 22<br />

13 26<br />

7 14<br />

2 2<br />

n=21<br />

freq %<br />

2 10<br />

1 5<br />

16 76<br />

2 10<br />

14 67<br />

3 14<br />

3 14<br />

0 0<br />

1 5<br />

8 38<br />

5 24<br />

1 5<br />

7 33<br />

21 100<br />

0 0<br />

0 0<br />

8 38<br />

2 10<br />

11 52<br />

0 0<br />

9 43<br />

4 20<br />

7 33<br />

1 5<br />

0 0<br />

97<br />

Result 2<br />

Difference<br />

patient<br />

subtypes<br />

n=12<br />

freq %<br />

1 8<br />

0 0<br />

9 75<br />

2 17<br />

8 67<br />

3 25<br />

0 0<br />

1 8<br />

0 0<br />

5 42<br />

1 8<br />

3 25<br />

3 25<br />

10 83<br />

1 8<br />

1 8<br />

5 42<br />

0 0<br />

6 50<br />

1 8<br />

4 33<br />

2 17<br />

4 33<br />

2 17<br />

0 0<br />

Result 3<br />

No Difference or<br />

inconsistency<br />

n=14<br />

freq %<br />

1 7<br />

0 0<br />

11 79<br />

2 14<br />

7 50<br />

2 14<br />

4 29<br />

1 7<br />

0 0<br />

9 64<br />

2 14<br />

0 0<br />

3 21<br />

12 86<br />

1 7<br />

1 7<br />

6 43<br />

2 14<br />

4 29<br />

2 14<br />

5 36<br />

5 36<br />

2 14<br />

0 0<br />

2 14<br />

Design: <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> the studies (71%, n=36) compared a picture specially produced<br />

for the test rather than pictures produced during therapy. Pre and post measures were<br />

159 Results - all cases frequencies percentage<br />

1. Difference patient/non patient 21 41.2<br />

2. Difference subtypes <strong>of</strong> patient 12 23.5<br />

3. No differences / inconsistencies 14 27.4<br />

4. Difference for therapy groups 4 7.8<br />

TOTAL 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!